… on FB Apr 25, 2013
5 Dos and Don’ts of International SEO – Whiteboard Friday
Posted by Aleyda
Many companies that wish to market to international audiences make the mistake of simply translating their content and redirecting users, not realizing that their standard messages won’t always resonate with other cultures. In today’s Whiteboard Friday, Aleyda Solis guides us through five things we all need to keep in mind as we think about how to establish an international SEO process.
Whiteboard Friday – Aleyda Solis – 5 Dos and Donts of International SEO
Note: In the spirit of international SEO, this Whiteboard Friday was also recorded in Spanish. If you’d like to watch that version instead, you can find it on Aleyda’s site.
Nota: Dentro del espÃritu del SEO Internacional, este “Whiteboard Friday” también fue filmado en Español. Si deseas ver esta versión, puedes encontrarla en el sitio de Aleyda.
For reference, here’s a still of this weeks’ whiteboard!
Video Transcription
Hello Moz fans. It’s a pleasure to be here today. I am here to talk a little about international SEO, five dos and don’ts that I see happening all the time. I would like to share them with you as an extension of my MozCon presentation about this topic.
The first one is to identify all the resources for your international SEO process from the beginning. This is very, very important that you advise your client, even if it’s not a pure SEO type of thing to do, or maybe some of the aspects that they need to take into consideration, not necessarily from an SEO perspective, it is important that you are a consultant for him. You say, “Hey, please be aware that in order to go international, at some point you will need native support. You will need to reply to your clients in the appropriate language. You will also need to be mindful about international deliveries if these are tangible products to be sent; the pricing, the currency, language, cultural factors, regionality factors. If it is language targeting, country targeting… all of these aspects are very, very important. Make sure that these are aligned with the website goal, and if at some point growth is needed, how this is going to grow.
All of these alternative and additional aspects that are not necessarily purely SEO, it’s very, very important that you advise your client so he is aware, because at the end, these can also be factors that might affect your work. You want this to be successful of course.
The second one is to plan the growth of your international web presence from the start. Again, it is very important that you identify where your profitable markets would be at the beginning, and where it’s better to start from a profit perspective. If you are going to target a specific country because there is enough search volume going on there about your services or products, or if there are not enough, then you will first target all of the language, which is specific landing pages maybe for some countries to test a little bit the market, but not with a full international website version for each one of the countries.
It is very important that you set this very well from the beginning and you are also aware of how you are going to evolve and migrate from one to another. Take into consideration also the pros and cons and the different alternatives from international web structure that I shared through my MozCon presentation. You can check on my slides, and I have also written about them before. You can see I have international SEO checklist that I published in the Moz Blog. You can also check out also in the SEER blog I have already written about international SEO strategy.
You can check the pros and cons of these different alternatives, like ccTLDs, subdirectories, subdomains. Verify if it is not possible, for example, to start with a ccTLD for a specific country, you need to start with a subdirectory, and then see how you are going to evolve from one to the other and how we are going to treat each language or each country so that they can coexist very well, if at some point you are country targeting and language targeting at the same time. These types of things are little things, but they are things that will keep your international web structure clean, consistent, and you will not face issues to growth in the future.
The third one is do not assume the behavior and preferences of your international markets and audience in general. Seasons can be different, the seasonality, the behavior of the users. Do not assume that the top products that you have for your current markets are going to be the top products necessarily for these other markets. Do full keyword research and behavior research. Research your competitors. Research how your audience behaves and what are the types of content that they most like, the formats they consume, the top media. All of these different aspects are going to affect, at the end, your operations and how you are going to promote and publish your content there and connect with this audience. At the end this is what you want. The final goal is to connect, to convert, to get benefits of course. Please be mindful of this. Do not assume anything. Never assume, even if it is an audience that speaks your same language, we wrongly assume that they will behave the same. No, no. Please verify this with all the trends, seasonality specifically, pricing models. All of this very important.
Also, avoid automatic content translations and redirects. If someone comes from Spain, do not automatically redirect the user to your Spanish version, for example. It is better to suggest. Suggest and tell them, “Hey, we have a version that might be more suitable for you.” Do not do it in an interstitial or an intrusive way, but in a friendly way. Take a look at how Amazon does it. I also shared an example in my MozCon presentation. In a very friendly way you can alert your user that there might be a better suited version for them. You are friendly with your users and friendly with search engines. You also promote your international versions, because at the end you also want to make the most out of them if you have them, of course.
The same with content. I have seen too many websites where they have just gone to Google and translated, copied and pasted the content and published it on their website. This needs to be done by a real person, a translator, a native person. You can say, “Okay, this costs too much. I am not able to do this.” If you start little by little and if you focus on the markets and the products, the most important ones and prioritize them, you do not need to go with an international web version that is a million pages at the beginning. You want to start little by little. It is better that you start and prioritize your international web version little by little, not with a huge amount of content, but good quality, localized content that really connects with the right audience.
The fifth one is measure each international web presence independently, but understand the interaction of each one of them. This is very, very important because you want to set an independent profile from Google Webmaster Tools or the other tools, the search engine that you are targeting and you are working with for the country that you are targeting. So from Webmaster Tools presence, each version should have their own profile there. Also with Google Analytics or your analytical software, each presence needs to have their own profile, again if you are tracking rankings of course.
So it is good that you segment a lot so you are able to verify and validate what the behavior of your international users is per presence and to be able to make the appropriate decisions and validate much better. But at the same time it is good if you can keep also web analytics an overall profile. You can also set the multi-domain tracking so that you can see what the behavior is from one presence to another. If at some point, one user arrived to another and ended up in another version, you can also see this and you can understand these are not two independent visits, but really one visitor going from one site to another.
All of this information I am pretty sure will be valuable. If there’s any other type of question that you have about international SEO, please let me know. Please leave a comment. I would love to be able to help. Also, take a look at the InternationalSEOmap.com website that I published from my MozCon presentation. Take a look at the slides and please let me know if you have any questions. Muchas gracias.
Video transcription by Speechpad.com
Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!
Continue reading →5 Dos and Don’ts of International SEO
Posted by Aleyda
Many companies that wish to market to international audiences make the mistake of simply translating their content and redirecting users, not realizing that their standard messages won’t always resonate with other cultures. In today’s Whiteboard Friday, Aleyda Solis guides us through five things we all need to keep in mind as we think about how to establish an international SEO process.
Whiteboard Friday – Aleyda Solis – 5 Dos and Donts of International SEO
Note: In the spirit of international SEO, this Whiteboard Friday was also recorded in Spanish. If you’d like to watch that version instead, you can find it on Aleyda’s site.
Nota: Dentro del espÃritu del SEO Internacional, este “Whiteboard Friday” también fue filmado en Español. Si deseas ver esta versión, puedes encontrarla en el sitio de Aleyda.
For reference, here’s a still of this weeks’ whiteboard!
Video Transcription
Hello Moz fans. It’s a pleasure to be here today. I am here to talk a little about international SEO, five dos and don’ts that I see happening all the time. I would like to share them with you as an extension of my MozCon presentation about this topic.
The first one is to identify all the resources for your international SEO process from the beginning. This is very, very important that you advise your client, even if it’s not a pure SEO type of thing to do, or maybe some of the aspects that they need to take into consideration, not necessarily from an SEO perspective, it is important that you are a consultant for him. You say, “Hey, please be aware that in order to go international, at some point you will need native support. You will need to reply to your clients in the appropriate language. You will also need to be mindful about international deliveries if these are tangible products to be sent; the pricing, the currency, language, cultural factors, regionality factors. If it is language targeting, country targeting… all of these aspects are very, very important. Make sure that these are aligned with the website goal, and if at some point growth is needed, how this is going to grow.
All of these alternative and additional aspects that are not necessarily purely SEO, it’s very, very important that you advise your client so he is aware, because at the end, these can also be factors that might affect your work. You want this to be successful of course.
The second one is to plan the growth of your international web presence from the start. Again, it is very important that you identify where your profitable markets would be at the beginning, and where it’s better to start from a profit perspective. If you are going to target a specific country because there is enough search volume going on there about your services or products, or if there are not enough, then you will first target all of the language, which is specific landing pages maybe for some countries to test a little bit the market, but not with a full international website version for each one of the countries.
It is very important that you set this very well from the beginning and you are also aware of how you are going to evolve and migrate from one to another. Take into consideration also the pros and cons and the different alternatives from international web structure that I shared through my MozCon presentation. You can check on my slides, and I have also written about them before. You can see I have international SEO checklist that I published in the Moz Blog. You can also check out also in the SEER blog I have already written about international SEO strategy.
You can check the pros and cons of these different alternatives, like ccTLDs, subdirectories, subdomains. Verify if it is not possible, for example, to start with a ccTLD for a specific country, you need to start with a subdirectory, and then see how you are going to evolve from one to the other and how we are going to treat each language or each country so that they can coexist very well, if at some point you are country targeting and language targeting at the same time. These types of things are little things, but they are things that will keep your international web structure clean, consistent, and you will not face issues to growth in the future.
The third one is do not assume the behavior and preferences of your international markets and audience in general. Seasons can be different, the seasonality, the behavior of the users. Do not assume that the top products that you have for your current markets are going to be the top products necessarily for these other markets. Do full keyword research and behavior research. Research your competitors. Research how your audience behaves and what are the types of content that they most like, the formats they consume, the top media. All of these different aspects are going to affect, at the end, your operations and how you are going to promote and publish your content there and connect with this audience. At the end this is what you want. The final goal is to connect, to convert, to get benefits of course. Please be mindful of this. Do not assume anything. Never assume, even if it is an audience that speaks your same language, we wrongly assume that they will behave the same. No, no. Please verify this with all the trends, seasonality specifically, pricing models. All of this very important.
Also, avoid automatic content translations and redirects. If someone comes from Spain, do not automatically redirect the user to your Spanish version, for example. It is better to suggest. Suggest and tell them, “Hey, we have a version that might be more suitable for you.” Do not do it in an interstitial or an intrusive way, but in a friendly way. Take a look at how Amazon does it. I also shared an example in my MozCon presentation. In a very friendly way you can alert your user that there might be a better suited version for them. You are friendly with your users and friendly with search engines. You also promote your international versions, because at the end you also want to make the most out of them if you have them, of course.
The same with content. I have seen too many websites where they have just gone to Google and translated, copied and pasted the content and published it on their website. This needs to be done by a real person, a translator, a native person. You can say, “Okay, this costs too much. I am not able to do this.” If you start little by little and if you focus on the markets and the products, the most important ones and prioritize them, you do not need to go with an international web version that is a million pages at the beginning. You want to start little by little. It is better that you start and prioritize your international web version little by little, not with a huge amount of content, but good quality, localized content that really connects with the right audience.
The fifth one is measure each international web presence independently, but understand the interaction of each one of them. This is very, very important because you want to set an independent profile from Google Webmaster Tools or the other tools, the search engine that you are targeting and you are working with for the country that you are targeting. So from Webmaster Tools presence, each version should have their own profile there. Also with Google Analytics or your analytical software, each presence needs to have their own profile, again if you are tracking rankings of course.
So it is good that you segment a lot so you are able to verify and validate what the behavior of your international users is per presence and to be able to make the appropriate decisions and validate much better. But at the same time it is good if you can keep also web analytics an overall profile. You can also set the multi-domain tracking so that you can see what the behavior is from one presence to another. If at some point, one user arrived to another and ended up in another version, you can also see this and you can understand these are not two independent visits, but really one visitor going from one site to another.
All of this information I am pretty sure will be valuable. If there’s any other type of question that you have about international SEO, please let me know. Please leave a comment. I would love to be able to help. Also, take a look at the InternationalSEOmap.com website that I published from my MozCon presentation. Take a look at the slides and please let me know if you have any questions. Muchas gracias.
Video transcription by Speechpad.com
Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!
Continue reading →Mega-SERP: A Visual Guide to Google
Posted by Dr-Pete
The days of 10 blue links are over, and Google’s search result pages seem to be evolving on a daily basis. We often see new SERP features in isolation, so I had an idea—what if I put all of them (or, at least, all of the big ones), on one mega-SERP? The following is a visual guide to the state of Google in 2013.
A few disclaimers
This is not a real Google SERP, although it is constructed from real results. Many of these features do not occur together in the wild. For example, you can have top+side or top+bottom AdWords blocks, but not all three. Statistics (after the image) were taken from 10,000 queries over the week of September 22, 2013 (daily average, as measured by the MozCast Project). These queries represent a variety of lengths and volumes, but do tend to skew commercial. This post is not an endorsement of any taco-related product or service, but I do love me some tacos. Without further ado, I give you Mega-SERP (click on the image for a full-sized version):
Let’s dive into these 24 distinct features, which I’ve grouped into five color-coded buckets: “Local,” “Advertising,” “Knowledge Graph,” “Vertical,” and “General.” Each feature includes, where available, the prevalence of that feature across MozCast’s 10K query set. The first percentage is by unique queries, and the second (in parentheses) is by query volume. Up first are the local features.
Local SERP features
(A) Local Carousel – 1.0% (0.3%)
There are two types of carousels—local and knowledge graph—but only one on any give SERP. I’ve chosen to show a local carousel, since they seem to impact more competitive queries and are reshaping the local SEO landscape.
(G) Local Knowledge Panel – 6.3% (3.4%)
Some organic results are blended with a local listing and map pin, and clicking on them pulls up a Knowledge Graph panel (previously called an “authoritative one-box”). These results don’t always appear in the #1 position, but they seem to be more common on higher authority sites.
(J) Local “Pack” Results – 7.3% (8.4%)
Blended packs are the most familiar local results, and mix Google Maps data with organic listing that have local relevance..he 7-pack accounting for 81% of the local packs in our data set. Packs range from two to seven local results, and we’ve seen them in any position from #1 to #9, but they tend to be more common in the top half of the SERP.
(M) Local “Near” Results – 5.1% (4.1%)
The “near” box is a pure local pack, pulling data directly from Google Maps. These packs max out at three results. Near boxes are usually called out with a header in the form of “[Query] near [Location]”.
(Y) Google Map + Pins – 11.3% (10.1%)
Results with “pinned” listings (such as local packs) almost always trigger a map, although the location, size, and even presence of the map has started to vary quite a bit. Except for traffic maps, all maps we’ve seen appear in the right-hand column.
Advertising and paid results
Advertising includes both the traditional AdWords blocks and the newer, paid inclusion results. Keep in mind that the presence of advertising is highly variable and depends on factors like competition, time of day, seasonality, etc. The numbers below should only be taken as rough estimates.
(C) AdWords Ads (Top) – 72.2% (72.8%)
The top-left AdWords block (above organic results) is easily the most common, and it ranges from one to three results. Ad formats are becoming much richer, as you can see from the Mega-SERP example, which includes both photos and site-links.
(D) Shopping Results (Left) – 18.2%* (19.0%)
Paid shopping results usually appear as a horizontal block of product images and links, but Google is testing variations. Shopping results can appear in either the left or right column, and are typically at the top. Our system currently only tracks total shopping results, and doesn’t separate the data for left vs. right.
(R) AdWords Ads (Bottom) – 16.5% (14.9%)
The bottom AdWords block is very similar to the top block, and can contain up to three results.
(T) Shopping Results (Right)
Most shopping results on the right look the same as results on the left, but there are some noticeable exceptions, such as paid product placement for a single product. Those variations are still the minority of cases, but expect Google to experiment a lot in the near future.
(W) AdWords Ads (Right) – 42.4% (41.6%)
The right-hand column block of ads has the highest count, and can contain up to eight AdWords ads. These ads typically have very few enhancements or added features. AdWords ads always seem to start at the top and then either flow into the right column or bottom section (never both, at least in our data).
Knowledge Graph features
Many people call the informational box in the right-hand column the “knowledge graph,” but the knowledge graph is a complex combination of data sources and algorithms that is starting to manifest across the SERP. Following are a few common entities that seem to be connected to the knowledge graph.
(B) List Carousel
Google recently (September 27th) launched a new form of white-backgrounded carousel (Mega-SERP query was “taco songs”), which currently seems to appear for certain music-related searches. Clicking on any song takes you to a new SERP and a prominent YouTube box at the top of the page.
(E) Answer Box – 1.4% (1.3%)
There are many, many shapes and sizes of answer boxes (see my post exploring 101 answer boxes), but they almost always appear as a gray-outlined box at the top of the left-hand column. Some of this data comes directly from third-party sources, but much of it seems to be tied to the knowledge graph.
(U) Knowledge Graph (Info) – 26.2%* (32.6%)
This is what most people think of when they hear “knowledge graph”—a block of information about a subject, in this case nutritional information. Informational knowledge graph boxes have many variants. Our data tracks all knowledge graph entities (except answer boxes) under one number, so the 26.5% represents the entire world of knowledge graph boxes.
(V) Knowledge Graph (Brand)
While technically still a knowledge graph box, brand boxes seem to be connected to Google+, allowing you to follow a brands G+ page and recent activity.
(X) Disambiguation Box
The disambiguation box occurs when Google thinks that a searcher’s intent is ambiguous and wants to provide options. In the Mega-SERP example, a search for “taco shell” brought up options for tortilla or Taco Bell. Clicking on one of these links triggers a new search.
Vertical search results
So-called “vertical” results used to be very cleanly separated in Google and not counted as organic listings, but that line is beginning to blur. For example, many video results now seem to be integrated directly as organic (as in the Mega-SERP example). I’m treating the new “In-depth articles” as a vertical result, because of its close relationship to news results.
(F) Image Mega-block
The mega-block of images is rare, and seems to only occur at the top in 7-result SERPs. The Mega-SERP example comes from the search “pictures of tacos”, and these images almost always appear for searches starting with “pictures of…”, “photos of…”, etc.
(I) Video Results – 18.5% (22.0%)
Currently, video results are integrated into organic results, with the exception that they show a thumbnail of the video and sometimes a publication date. Video results can appear at any position in the SERP.
(N) Image Results – 24.6% (27.5%)
Image results are still a “true” vertical and are tied directly to Google Image search. Standard image results appear as a horizontal block of images in the left-hand column, and their position varies. These results link directly to Google Images.
(O) News Results – 19.6% (29.8%)
News results are another true vertical, and also occur as a distinct block in the left-hand column. The news block can have up to three links, and the first link is often enhanced with a thumbnail image.
(Q) In-depth Articles – 5.2% (9.9%)
Launched in August of 2013, “In-depth articles” are one of the biggest new features of the year. The in-depth block is a fairly large set of three articles (which can all have thumbnails, currently). Google seems to reserve this block for content that is evergreen and literally “in-depth,” and most of these links come from major publications like The New York Times. Unlike news results, these links may be months or even years old and are not updated regularly.
Miscellaneous features
Finally, we have the SERP features that just don’t belong to any one group. Sorry, miscellaneous features—we still love you.
(H) Site-links (6-pack) – 19.4% (19.9%)
The #1 organic listing may be rewarded with expanded site-links—anywhere from one to six, depending on the site. There is a perfect correlation, at least in our data, between site-links and 7-result SERPs (i.e. if a result has site-links, it’s a 7-result SERP). Google is experimenting with 10-packs of site-links, but only for domain queries (currently), like “tacobell.com“.
(K) Authorship Mark-up – 21.9% (20.9%)
If Google can connect a resource to a Google+ entity, that result may get authorship mark-up, which adds a thumbnail of the author, his/her name, and some basic G+ stats. Also, there’s apparently such a thing as “taco journalism.”
(L) Review Mark-up – 24.0% (24.6%)
Products, recipes, and other appropriate entities may show review data, including stars. In the Mega-SERP example, the recipe listing is also showing a thumbnail image.
(P) Social Results
Social results have evolved a lot in the past year or so, and the current incarnation looks a lot like authorship mark-up, but there’s one big difference—these results are 100% personalized. My friend Dan is only showing up here because we’re in each other’s G+ circles.
(S) Related Searches
This aspect of the SERP has almost become so ubiquitous that I hesitate to even call it a feature. The vast majority of searches (sorry, we don’t have exact numbers on this one) have links at the bottom to related topics.
Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!
Continue reading →