Posted by BritneyMuller

Keyword research, the blueprint to any successful SEO strategy

If you’ve been doing keyword research for a while, you’ve probably fallen into a routine. And that routine has likely been recently disrupted… thanks, Google.

If you’re new to keyword research, getting comfortable with new keyword research tools will come more easily to you. Lucky pups. But us change-averse old dogs can still learn new tricks when we need to. Are you ready to see which tool is right for you? –Woof.

My hesitations about writing this article:

• I’m new to Moz and don’t want to be crucified for criticizing our own keyword research tool. This concern has only been met with acceptance and encouragement, so…*fingers crossed* they don’t change their minds. Love you guys!
• My methods of keyword research revolve around finding qualified traffic for increasing conversions, not just any large search volume numbers (to make traffic look good).
• I fear that this will come across as a Moz Keyword Explorer soft sell. It’s not. It’s a very honest comparison of Moz Keyword Explorer versus Google’s Keyword Planner. It’s a post that I’ve been wanting to read for a while.

Here are some great guides if you need a Moz Keyword Explorer refresher, or a Google Keyword Planner refresher.

< << TL;DR Skip to the conclusion here >> >

Google Keyword Planner’s recent change

Any habits we’ve held onto with Google Keyword Planner were disrupted early September when they decided to stop providing average monthly search volume data (unless you’re in that special group of higher-paying ad buyers who can still access the more precise search volume data). Instead, we now see huge swings of min-max search volume, which really starts to muddy the keyword research waters. Google recently came forward to explain that this change was done to deter scrapers from pulling their search volume data.

For a more comprehensive write-up on this change, read Google Keyword Unplanner by Russ Jones. He explains a little more about how this change affects various data sources and what Moz has been doing to mitigate the impact.

But, showing is better than telling. So let’s take a look for ourselves:

A 900,000 average monthly search volume swing is crazy! In fact, Google now only provides one of seven volume sizes: 0–10, 10–100, 100–1000, 1000–10000, 10000–100k, 100k–1MM and 1MM+.

Moz’s Keyword Explorer also gives ranges, but they’re not nearly as vast (or as arbitrary). The machine-learning model behind Keyword Explorer is designed to predict monthly fluctuations in search volume. It’s mathematically tied to the most accurate keyword data available, and you can see exactly how, and how accurate Moz gets in this Clickstream Data to the Rescue article.

Which is why I wanted to know:

What’s most important to you when doing Keyword Research?
— Britney Muller (@BritneyMuller) September 1, 2016

What are quality keywords?

Quality keywords successfully target your demographic during their acquisition phase (education – purchase), have a specific searcher intent, low-medium organic competition, and medium-high search volume (this will vary based on what part of the acquisition funnel you’re targeting).

However, it’s important to keep in mind that some longer-tail queries (with little to no search volume) can be highly profitable as well.

---

Tier 1 keyword research setup

Google Keyword Planner:

This is my familiar ol, kooky friend that has been acting very strange lately (anyone else noticing all of the delays and glitches?). I’m a little worried.

Anywho, here’s how I begin keyword research within Keyword Planner:

1. Enter in your keyword under “Search for more keywords using a phrase, website or category.”
2. Make sure the region is set to United States (if wanting to research nationally).
3. Set keyword options to “broad.” –Settle down, we’ll go back and change this to “closely related” after our first swoop.
4. Sort keyword volume by highest to lowest and change the “show rows” to 100.
5. IMPORTANT: Always scroll top to bottom! Otherwise, new keywords will populate from the bottom that you’ll miss.
6. Select keywords with unique intents as you scroll down the first 100 rows, click “next,” and start again from the top until through all keyword results.

Moz Keyword Explorer:

My hip new friend that I’m not sure I can trust just yet. However, multiple trusted friends vouch for her integrity and… I really dig her style.

Here’s how I begin keyword research within Keyword Explorer:

1. Enter your keyword into the Keyword Explorer search bar.
2. Navigate to “Keyword Suggestions” on the left-hand menu.
3. Set “Display keyword suggestions that” to “include a mix of sources.”
4. Set “Group Keywords” to “no.”
5. Sort keyword list by highest search volume to lowest.
6. Scroll down and select keywords with unique searcher intent.

Either way, this will give you one giant list of 1,000 keywords, which can be tough to pace through (compared to the 100 keyword chunks in GKP). A progress bar of sorts would be nice.

The thing that’s taken the most getting used to is not seeing a competition/difficulty metric adjacent to the search volume. The whole goal of keyword research is to discover opportunity gaps that offer mid-to-high search volume with low competition. If you’re anything like me, you’ve ran hundreds if not thousands of strange SEO tests and are very aware of what you can achieve “competition”-wise (domain-dependent) and what you can’t. (Or when a higher-competition keyword should take the form of a longer SEO plan.)

*It’s important to note that the KWP “Competition” metric is an advertising metric.

Despite this metric occasionally leading to an SEO correlation, it’s often misleading and not an accurate representation of how competitive the organic results are.

The KWE “Difficulty” metric, on the other hand, is an organic search metric. It also leverages a smarter CTR curve model to show when weaker pages are ranking higher (in addition to other ranking signals).

That being said, having to wait to find out the competition metric of a keyword until after I add it to a list is frustrating. I can’t help but feel that I’m not selecting keywords as strategically as I could be. Hopefully, Moz will add a historical competition metric up front (adjacent to search volume) sometime in the near future to help us better select ripe keyword opportunities.

The relevancy metric doesn’t do much to help my research because I’m already relying on the keywords themselves to tell me whether or not they’re relevant/have a unique user intent.

(I told you guys I would be honest!)

Label by keyword type:

Navigational: Searchers seeking a destination on the web.

Example: “University of Minnesota tuition”

Informational: Searchers researching, getting quick answers, often times using what, who, where, how, etc. modifiers.

Example: “what is a conker”

Commercial Investigation: Searchers investigating beyond an informational query. Comparing brands, searching for “best,” researching potential clients, etc.

Example: “ppc experts in london”

Transactional: Searchers looking to purchase something, comparing rates, seeking prices for things, etc.

Example: “affordable yoda action figure”

Transactional and Commercial Investigation types tend to be most profitable (depending on business model). For example, a blog could do very well from Informational-type keywords.

If you want a more in-depth understanding of keyword types; read Rand’s Segmenting Search Intent. <– An oldie, but a goodie!!

Compare results & answer:

• Which tool provided better long-tail results?
• Which tool provided better top-of-funnel queries?
• What percentage of “keyword types” did each tool provide?
• What are the advantages and disadvantages of each tool?

For whatever reason, “student loans” painted an accurate picture (of what I’ve found to be true across other competitive keywords) for each prospective tools’ wheelhouse. So, “student loans” will serve as our point of reference throughout this comparative analysis.

---

Tier 1 keyword research overview:

	Moz Keyword Explorer	Google Keyword Planner
Term:	“student loans”	“student loans”
Region:	United States	United States
Spectrum:	Include a mix of sources	Broad
Group Keywords:	No	–
Total Results:	1000	700
#Keywords With Intents:	43	40

---

+ Moz Keyword Explorer results:

Keyword	Modifier	Type	Min Volume	Max Volume	Difficulty	Opportunity	Importance	Potential
student loan consolidation	consolidation	Commercial Investigation	11501	30300	60	83	3	79
student loan calculator	calculator	Informational	11501	30300	75	100	3	76
student loan	–	Informational	118001	300000	82	84	3	82
federal student loan	federal	Navigational	30301	70800	63	48	3	76
student loan refinance	refinance	Commercial Investigation	11501	30300	55	83	3	77
student loan repayment calculator	repayment calculator	Informational	11501	30300	67	100	3	74
student loan interest rates	interest rates	Commercial Investigation	6501	9300	53	54	3	69
student loan hero	hero	Navigational	1701	2900	49	19	3	53
student loan forgiveness	forgiveness	Commercial Investigation	70801	118000	62	86	3	86
student loans information	information	Informational	501	850	90	55	3	39
applying for student loans	applying for	Informational	4301	6500	72	55	3	60
fafsa student loans	fafsa	Navigational	2901	4300	98	56	3	28
bad credit student loan	bad credit	Commercial Investigation	1701	2900	44	83	3	70
student loan websites	websites	Commercial Investigation	851	1700	79	53	3	48
where to get student loan	where to get	Informational	501	850	76	55	3	47
citibank student loans pay	citibank pay	Navigational	201	500	29	94	3	64
how to get a school loan	how to get a	Informational	201	500	68	55	3	45
how to find my student loans	how to find my	Navigational	101	200	54	58	3	48
how to check student loans	how to check	Navigational	101	200	63	55	3	45
discover private student loan	discover private	Navigational	101	200	53	21	3	36
check my student loan balance	check my balance	Navigational	101	200	55	100	3	52
apply for student loan online	apply for online	Transactional	101	200	68	53	3	41
look up student loans	look up	Commercial Investigation	101	200	53	90	3	51
student loan now	now	Transactional	51	100	72	86	3	42
stafford student loans login	stafford login	Navigational	51	100	76	60	3	36
federal student loan lookup	federal lookup	Navigational	11	50	55	100	3	46
how to view my student loans	how to view my	Informational	11	50	57	64	3	39
how do i find out who has my student loan	how do i find out who has my	Informational	11	50	59	86	3	42
apply for additional student loans	apply for additional	Commercial Investigation	11	50	73	64	3	34
what student loans do i owe	what do i owe	Informational	11	50	50	41	3	34
student loan application status	application status	Navigational	0	10	72	100	3	33
what is federal student loans	what is federal	Informational	0	10	78	58	3	25
who services federal student loans	who services federal	Informational	0	10	68	100	3	22
apply for student loan by phone	apply for by phone	Transactional	0	10	86	86	3	11
national student loan locator phone number	national locator phone number	Informational	0	0	58	29	3	11
i owe student loans who do i call	i owe who do i call	Informational	0	0	50	94	3	26
where do i find my student loan interest	where do i find my interest	Informational	0	0	78	58	3	11
how to find my student loan account number	how to find my account number	Informational	0	0	55	100	3	25
how much federal student loans do i have	how much federal do i have	Navigational	0	0	80	46	3	8
where do i pay my government student loans	where do i pay my government	Navigational	0	0	77	55	3	11
student loans lookup	lookup	Navigational	0	0	55	100	3	26
student loans payment history	payment history	Navigational	0	0	66	46	3	14
how many school loans do i have	how many do i have	Navigational	0	0	68	90	3	21

Additional tool features:

The Importance metric: …is powerful! However, I’ve left all my results at a neutral Importance (3) so you can see downloaded results without any customization (and to keep things fair, because I’m not prioritizing GKP keywords).

If you choose to use this metric, you set a priority level for each keyword (1=not important, 10=most important) that will then influence the keyword’s Potential score. This allows you to more easily prioritize a keyword plan, which is very helpful.

Group keywords with low lexical similarity: While this can save you time, it can also lead to missing keyword opportunities. In my example below, if I select “student loans” (and not “Select 821 keywords in group”), I would miss all of the nested keywords.

Use this feature carefully:

---

+ Google Keyword Planner results:

Keyword	Modifier	Type	Avg. Monthly Searches (exact match only)	Competition	Suggested Bid
student loan forgiveness	forgiveness	Commercial Investigation	100K – 1M	0.58	3.38
student loan refinance	refinance	Commercial Investigation	10K – 100K	0.96	34.57
student loan consolidation	consolidation	Commercial Investigation	10K – 100K	0.98	22.52
private student loans	private	Commercial Investigation	10K – 100K	0.99	28.51
student loans without a cosigner	without a cosigner	Commercial Investigation	1K – 10K	0.98	23.85
parent student loans	parent	Commercial Investigation	1K – 10K	0.96	10.27
best private student loans	best private	Commercial Investigation	1K – 10K	0.93	21.33
bad credit student loans	bad credit	Commercial Investigation	1K – 10K	0.97	4.02
best student loans	best	Commercial Investigation	1K – 10K	0.93	18.61
compare student loans	compare	Commercial Investigation	100 – 1K	0.98	23.8
medical student loans	medical	Commercial Investigation	100 – 1K	0.91	10.16
student loans from banks	from banks	Commercial Investigation	100 – 1K	0.97	13.09
student loans for international students	for international students	Commercial Investigation	100 – 1K	0.88	14.01
no credit check student loans	no credit check	Commercial Investigation	100 – 1K	0.98	5.74
nursing student loans	nursing	Commercial Investigation	100 – 1K	0.94	15.53
alternative student loan options	alternative options	Commercial Investigation	10 – 100	1	30.32
best student loan consolidation program	best consolidation program	Commercial Investigation	10 – 100	0.91	36.91
student loan bankruptcy	bankruptcy	Commercial Investigation	1K – 10K	0.42	9.48
student loan deferment	deferment	Commercial Investigation	1K – 10K	0.35	10.31
student loans		Informational	100K – 1M	0.98	25.97
student loan calculator	calculator	Informational	10K – 100K	0.42	5.41
types of student loans	types of	Informational	1K – 10K	0.82	13.61
student loan options	options	Informational	1K – 10K	0.99	23.63
how to consolidate student loans	how to consolidate	Informational	1K – 10K	0.84	13.79
student loan default	default	Informational	1K – 10K	0.28	8.18
student loan help	help	Informational	1K – 10K	0.96	15.48
where to get student loans	where to get	Informational	100 – 1K	0.97	17.19
average student loan	average	Informational	100 – 1K	0.33	18.59
private education loans	private	Informational	100 – 1K	0.98	16.76
what is a student loan	what is	Informational	100 – 1K	0.6	8.75
how do you get a student loan	how do you get	Informational	100 – 1K	0.94	5.22
no credit student loans	no credit	Informational	100 – 1K	0.98	7.85
about student loans	about	Informational	10 – 100	0.92	14.9
information on student loans	information	Informational	10 – 100	0.94	14.08
iowa student loan	iowa	Navigational	10K – 100K	0.23	9.08
great lakes student loans	great lakes	Navigational	10K – 100K	0.18	7.05
fafsa student loans	fafsa	Navigational	1K – 10K	0.61	7.41
student loan interest rates	interest rates	Transactional	1K – 10K	0.7	10.11
low interest student loans	low interest	Transactional	100 – 1K	0.98	21.07
need student loan today	need today	Transactional	10 – 100	1	9.8
i need a student loan now	i need now	Transactional	10 – 100	0.99	13.7

---

Tier 1 conclusion:

Google Keyword Planner largely uncovered Commercial Investigation and Informational queries. GKP also better identified a broader set of top-of-funnel keyword opportunities: student loan help, parent student loans, types of student loans, etc.

Moz Keyword Explorer largely uncovered Informational and Navigational queries. MKE better identified longer-tail keyword opportunities: how to get a school loan, apply for student loan online, apply for student loan by phone, etc.

---

Tier 2 keyword research setup

“closely related search terms” vs. “only include keywords with all of the query terms”

Google Keyword Planner: Perform same setup, but select “Only show ideas closely related to my search terms.”

Moz Keyword Explorer: Perform same setup, but select “only include keywords with all of the query terms.”

Note: Your .csv download will still say “Broad” for Google Keyword Planner, even though you’ve selected “Closely related”… Told you she was acting funny.

---

Tier 2 keyword research overview:

	Moz Keyword Explorer	Google Keyword Planner
Term:	“student loans”	“student loans”
Region:	United States	United States
Spectrum:	Only include keywords with all of the query terms	Closely related
Group Keywords:	No	–
Total Results:	1000	700
#Keywords With Intents:	66	30

---

+ Moz Keyword Explorer results:

Keyword	Modifier	Type	Min Volume	Max Volume	Difficulty	Opportunity	Importance	Potential
student loan	–	Informational	118001	300000	82	84	3	82
student loan forgiveness	forgiveness	Commercial Investigation	70801	118000	62	86	3	86
student loan calculator	calculator	Commercial Investigation	11501	30300	75	100	3	76
citi student loan	citi	Navigational	11501	30300	34	94	3	86
student loan consolidation	consolidation	Commercial Investigation	11501	30300	60	83	3	79
private student loan	loan	Commercial Investigation	11501	30300	62	80	3	77
student loan refinance	refinance	Commercial Investigation	11501	30300	55	83	3	77
student loan repayment calculator	repayment calculator	Commercial Investigation	11501	30300	67	100	3	74
student loan interest rates	interest rates	Transactional	6501	9300	53	54	3	69
application for student loan	application for	Commercial Investigation	4301	6500	64	54	3	63
apply for student loan	apply for	Commercial Investigation	4301	6500	60	53	3	64
student loan forgiveness for teachers	forgiveness for teachers	Commercial Investigation	4301	6500	58	100	3	71
bad credit student loan	bad credit	Commercial Investigation	1701	2900	44	83	3	70
student loan hero	hero	Navigational	1701	2900	49	19	3	53
student loan servicing	servicing	Commercial Investigation	1701	2900	70	90	3	62
discovery student loan	discovery	Navigational	851	1700	47	28	3	51
fsa student loan	fsa	Navigational	851	1700	90	58	3	41
student loan providers	providers	Commercial Investigation	501	850	66	53	3	51
where to get student loan	where to get	Informational	501	850	76	55	3	47
check student loan balance	check balance	Navigational	201	500	54	46	3	49
department of education student loan servicing center	department of education servicing center	Navigational	201	500	78	58	3	42
student loan status	status	Navigational	201	500	61	86	3	54
us student loan debt	us debt	Informational	201	500	66	56	3	49
all student loan	all	Informational	101	200	58	56	3	45
discover private student loan	discover private	Navigational	101	200	53	21	3	36
how do i find my student loan	how do i find my interest	Informational	101	200	59	86	3	51
student loan management	management	Commercial Investigation	101	200	57	53	3	45
student loan resources	resources	Commercial Investigation	101	200	49	83	3	52
where is my student loan	where is	Informational	51	100	61	55	3	42
student loan corporation citibank	corporation citibank	Navigational	11	50	36	94	3	45
student loan enquiries	enquiries	Commercial Investigation	11	50	61	100	3	43
fafsa student loan consolidation	fafsa consolidation	Navigational	11	50	99	53	3	1
federal student loan options	federal options	Commercial Investigation	11	50	75	54	3	34
federal student loan terms	federal terms	Commercial Investigation	11	50	81	90	3	31
get a student loan today	get a today	Transactional	11	50	66	83	3	41
need student loan now	need now	Transactional	11	50	71	83	3	37
student loan overview	overview	Informational	11	50	79	94	3	35
student loan payment history	payment history	Navigational	11	50	55	100	3	46
student loan website down	website down	Informational	11	50	42	90	3	44
apply for student loan by phone	apply for by phone	Commercial Investigation	0	10	86	86	3	11
apply online for student loan	apply online for	Commercial Investigation	0	10	68	53	3	28
citibank student loan promotional code	citibank promotional code	Navigational	0	10	38	94	3	28
student loan corporation sallie mae	corporation sallie mae	Commercial Investigation	0	10	63	100	3	23
dsl student loan	dsl	Navigational	0	10	51	90	3	38
how do i take out a federal student loan	how do i take out a federal	Informational	0	10	80	55	3	22
how to pay student loan online	how to pay online	Informational	0	10	52	55	3	32
student loan management app	management app	Commercial Investigation	0	10	43	83	3	26
my student loan account number	my account number	Informational	0	10	65	64	3	18
student loan servicing center pennsylvania	servicing center pennsylvania	Navigational	0	10	52	88	3	38
where to pay my student loan	where to pay my	Informational	0	10	68	100	3	22
student loan counseling center	counseling center	Commercial Investigation	0	0	58	83	3	23
deadline for student loan application	deadline for application	Informational	0	0	68	60	3	16
educated borrower student loan	educated borrower	Commercial Investigation	0	0	54	83	3	24
get subsidized student loan	get subsidized	Commercial Investigation	0	0	64	90	3	22
how do i find my student loan account number	how do i find my account number	Informational	0	0	55	100	3	26
how much student loan can i have	how much can i have	Informational	0	0	71	55	3	14
how to check the status of a student loan from direct loans	how to check the status of a	Informational	0	0	86	90	3	11
how to find out who is my student loan lender	how to find out who is my lender	Informational	0	0	60	60	3	19
how to get your student loan money	how to get your money	Informational	0	0	39	56	3	22
student loan information eligibility	information eligibility	Commercial Investigation	0	0	85	86	3	11
is financial aid a student loan	is financial aid a	Informational	0	0	72	60	3	15
national student loan data system for parents	national data system for parents	Commercial Investigation	0	0	53	22	3	10
national student loan database contact number	national database contact number	Navigational	0	0	57	64	3	20
nslds student loan login	nslds login	Navigational	0	0	73	46	3	11
subsidized loan and unsubsidized student loan	subsidized and unsubsidized	Commercial Investigation	0	0	57	94	3	24
what is a national direct student loan	what is a national direct	Informational	0	0	66	64	3	17

---

+ Google Keyword Planner results:

Keyword	Modifier	Type	Avg. Monthly Searches (exact match only)	Competition	Suggested bid
student loan application	application	Commercial Investigation	1K – 10K	0.98	22.37
student loan bankruptcy	bankruptcy	Commercial Investigation	1K – 10K	0.42	9.48
how to get a student loan	how to get	Informational	1K – 10K	0.92	10.59
student loan help	help	Informational	1K – 10K	0.96	15.48
student loan deferment	deferment	Commercial Investigation	1K – 10K	0.35	10.31
alaska student loan	alsaska	Navigational	1K – 10K	0.54	2.21
south carolina student loan	south carolina	Navigational	1K – 10K	0.45	23.59
texas guaranteed student loan	texas guranteed	Navigational	1K – 10K	0.5	17.34
student loan interest rates	interest rates	Transactional	1K – 10K	0.7	10.11
student loan consolidation rates	consolidation rates	Transactional	1K – 10K	0.94	17.44
student loan refinance	refinance	Commercial Investigation	10K – 100K	0.96	34.57
student loan consolidation	consolidation	Commercial Investigation	10K – 100K	0.98	22.52
student loan calculator	calculator	Informational	10K – 100K	0.42	5.41
student loan gov	gov	Navigational	10K – 100K	0.28	16.42
iowa student loan	iowa	Navigational	10K – 100K	0.23	9.08
student loan forgiveness	forgiveness	Commercial Investigation	100K – 1M	0.58	3.38
what is a student loan	what is	Informational	100 – 1K	0.6	8.75
how can i get a student loan	how can I get	Informational	100 – 1K	0.97	7.71
how to get a private student loan	how to get a private	Informational	100 – 1K	0.96	14.82
student loan app	application	Navigational	100 – 1K	0.83	11.89
student loan cancellation	cancellation	Transactional	100 – 1K	0.41	4.5
student loan tax	tax	Transactional	100 – 1K	0.25	47.05
medical student loan consolidation	medical consolidation	Commercial Investigation	10 – 100	0.93	0
federal student loan options	federal options	Commercial Investigation	10 – 100	0.75	7.45
student loan consolidation faq	consolidation faq	Commercial Investigation	10 – 100	0.76	15.94
how to figure out student loan interest	how to figure out interest	Informational	10 – 100	0.38	10.52
how to apply for a student loan online	how to apply	Informational	10 – 100	1	20.61
how much is my student loan payment	how much is my	Informational	10 – 100	0.22	20.96
need a student loan now	need now	Transactional	10 – 100	0.99	12.02
need student loan today	need today	Transactional	10 – 100	1	9.8

---

Tier 2 conclusion:

Google Keyword Planner largely uncovered a pretty even percentage of all 4 keyword types (30% Informational, 20% Navigational, 30% Commercial Investigation, and 20% Transactional). GKP also continued to provide a broader set of top-of-funnel keyword opportunities: student loan bankruptcy, student loan gov, student loan help, how to get a student loan, etc.

Moz Keyword Explorer largely uncovered Commercial Investigation and Informational queries. MKE also continued to provide a broader set of long-tail keyword opportunities: student loan forgiveness for teachers, student loan providers, student loan status, how do i find my student loan, etc.

---

Where this is the end of the road for Google results, Moz has some other filters up its sleeve:

Let’s explore the other available Moz keyword filters and examine the discovered keyword results (keywords with unique intent).

Exclude your query terms to get broader ideas: 25 keywords

Most results are longer-tail queries around college tuition, educational expenses, private school tuition, etc. This evenly resulted in Informational, Navigational, and Transactional keyword results:

Based on closely related topics: 35 keywords

One of the more evenly distributed (search volume) results in this example. Most keyword results are around other types of loans or grants: payday loan, pell grants, auto loan, private loans, etc.

Based on broadly related topics and synonyms: 74 keywords

Results are mostly three words or longer and revolve around more specific types of loans; great lakes student loans, wells fargo student loans, student loan chase, etc.

Related to keywords with similar results pages: 187 keywords

Results are mostly long-tail Commercial Investigation queries around loan payments, student loan consolidation, student loan forgiveness for teachers, student loan payment help, etc.

Are questions: 111 keywords

Last, but certainly not least. The crème de la crème of an FAQ page.

Results reveal long-tail student loan questions (mostly Informational), like: can you file bankruptcy on student loans, do student loans affect credit score, are student loans tax deductible, where can i get a student loan, etc.

---

TL;DR

Conclusion:

Google Keyword Planner has limited search volume data, but continues to provide a broader set of top-of-funnel keywords (high volume, low competition <– ad metric). Despite the “closely related” filter resulting in a more even percentage of all 4 keyword types, it provided fairly similar results (35.4% duplicate) to “broad.” Commercial and Informational keyword types were most commonly found.

Moz Keyword Explorer provides more accurate search volume data, while providing a broader set of long-tail keywords (mid-to-low volume, low competition). The many keyword filters provide a wide range of keyword results (17% duplicate in first two filters) and keyword types depending on which keyword filter you use. However, Informational, Commercial Investigation, and Navigational keyword types were most commonly found.

Pros:

Moz Keyword Explorer:	Google Keyword Planner:
The keyword search volume accuracy (IMO) is the most impressive part of this tool.	The ability to view monthly trends, mobile versus desktop searches, and geo-popular areas is wonderful.
Better UX.	Can add negative keywords/keywords to not include in results.
Keyword suggestion filters reveal far more keyword results.	Sorting by 100 keywords is a nice cadence.
The “are questions” filter is incredibly useful for things like FAQ pages and content marketing ideas.	Google Sheet download integration.
Saved keyword lists (that can be refreshed!? Say whaa!?)	Average keyword bid (for further competition insight).
Detailed SERP data for SERP feature opportunities.	Monthly keyword trend data (on hover).
Organic competition metric.	Ability to target specific hyper-local areas.
Ability to prioritize keywords which influences the Potential metric (for smarter keyword prioritization).

Cons:

Moz Keyword Explorer:	Google Keyword Planner:
The Min Volume | Max Volume | Difficulty | Opportunity | Importance | Potential can be overwhelming.	Search volume ranges are widely skewed and bucketed.
No Google Sheet download integration.	Individuals who start adding keywords from the bottom up of a list (scrolling up) will miss newly populated results.
No “select all” option.	Broad & Closely Related filters tend to provide very similar results.
The list of 1,000 keyword results can be daunting when doing lots of keyword research.	No SERP feature data.
Inability to target specific local regions.	Can’t save lists.
	Clunky, slow UX.

Which is right for you?

I’d consider where you want to target people in your sales funnel, and where you need to improve your current website traffic. If you have wide top-of-funnel traffic for your product/service and need to better provide long-tail transactions, check out Moz Keyword Explorer. If you need a brief overview of top-level searches, take a look at Google Keyword Planner results.

Which do I use?

I’m a little ashamed to say that I still use both. Checking Google Keyword Planner gives me the peace of mind that I’m not missing anything. But, Moz Keyword Explorer continues to impress me with its search volume accuracy and ease of list creation. As it gets better with top-of-funnel keywords (and hopefully integrates competition up front) I would love to transition completely over to Moz.

Other keyword research tips:

I’ve also been a big fan of ubersuggest.io to give your initial keyword list a boost. You can add your selected keywords directly to Google Keyword Planner or Moz Keyword Explorer for instant keyword data. This can help identify where you should take your keyword research in terms of intent, sub-topic intents, geographic, etc.

Answer the Public is also a great resource for FAQ pages. Just make sure to change the location if you are not based in the UK.

Would love your feedback!

• Please let me know if you can think of other ways to determine the quality of keywords from each tool.
• Any other pros/cons that you would add?
• What other tools have you been using for keyword research?

Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!

Continue reading →

Posted by randfishFrom your top-level nav to your seal-the-deal content, there are endless considerations when it comes to crafting your ecommerce page. Using one of his personal favorite examples, Rand takes you step by detailed step through the proce… Continue reading →

Posted by MiriamEllis

Implement generosity.

If I could sum up all of the thoughts I’m about to share with local enterprises, it would be with those two words.

Image via Lewis Kelly

Disasters and emergencies are unavoidable challenges faced by all local communities. How businesses respond to these stressful and sometimes devastating events spotlight company policy for cities to see. Once flood waters reside or cyclones trail away, once the dust settles, which of these two brands would you wish to call yours?:

How two brands’ reaction to disaster became a reputation-defining moment

As Hurricane Matthew moved toward the southeastern United States this month (in October 2016), millions of citizens evacuated, many of them not knowing where to find safe shelter. Brand A (a franchise location of an international hotel chain) responded by allegedly quadrupling the prices of its rooms — a practice known as ‘price gouging,’ which is illegal during declared emergencies in 34 states. Brand B (the international accommodations entity Airbnb) responded by sourcing thousands of free local rooms from its hosts for victims of the hurricane.

And then professional and social media responded with news stories, social communications, and reviews, trying both brands in the court of public opinion, doling out blame and praise.

This is how reputations are broken and made in today’s connected world, and the extremity of this tragic emergency situation brought two factors into high relief for these two brands:

Culture and preparedness

“I don’t know about the prices. I just run the hotel. I don’t set the prices. Corporate sets the prices.”

This is how the manager of the Brand A hotel franchise location responded when questioned by a TV news reporter regarding alleged price gouging, set amid a backdrop of elders and families with small children unable to afford a room at 4x its normal rate.

“We are deeply troubled by these allegations as they in no way reflect our brand values. This hotel is franchised. We don’t manage inventory or rates.”

This is the official response from corporate issued to the news network, and while Brand A promised to investigate, the public impression was made that the buck was being passed back and forth between different entities while evacuees were in danger. Based on the significant response from social media, including non-guideline-compliant user reviews from people who had never even stayed at this hotel, corporate culture was being perceived as greedy rather than fair to an extreme degree. It’s important to note here that I didn’t encounter a single sentiment expressed by consumers expecting that the rooms at this hotel would be given away for free. It was the quadrupling of the price that brought public condemnation.

Consumers are not privy to the creation of company policy. They aren’t able to puzzle out who made the decision to raise prices as this hotel, or at the many other hotels, gas stations, and stores in Florida which viewed an emergency as an opportunity for profit. Doubtless, the concept of supply and demand fuels this type of decision-making, but in an atmosphere lacking adequate transparency, the consumer is left with judging whether policy feels fair or unfair, and whether it aligns with their personal value system.

While we’ll likely never know the internal communications which led to this franchise location being cited by the public and investigated by the authorities for alleged price gouging, it is crystal clear that the corporate brand was not prepared in advance with a policy for times of emergency to be enacted by all franchisees. This, then, leaves the franchisee working within vague latitudes of allowable practices, which can result in long-lasting damage to the overall brand, coupled with damage to the local community being served. It’s a scenario of universal negativity and one that certainly can’t be made up for by a few days’ worth of increased profits.

You’ve likely noticed by now that I am specifically not naming this hotel. In the empathetic spirit of the carefully-crafted TAGFEE policy of Moz, my goal here is not to shame a particular business. Rather, it’s my hope that seeing the outcomes of policy will embolden companies to aim high in mirroring the value systems of consumers who reward fairness and generosity with genuine loyalty.

Ideally, I’d love to live in a world in which all businesses are motivated by concern for the common good, but barring this, I would at least like to demonstrate how generous policy is actually good policy and good business. Let’s turn our eyes to Brand B, which lit a beacon of hope in the midst of this recent disaster, as described in this excerpt from Wired:

“This was profound,” says Patrick Meier, a humanitarian technology expert who consults for the World Bank, the Australian Red Cross, and Facebook. “Airbnb changed its code order to allow people to rent out their place for zero dollars, because you could not do that otherwise.”

Innovation shines brightly in this account of Airbnb recognizing that communities around the world contain considerable resources of goodwill, which can then be amplified via technology.

The company has dedicated its own resources to developing an emergency response strategy, including the hire of a disaster response expert and an overhaul of the website’s code to enable free rentals. Thanks to the generosity of hosts who are willing open their doors to their fellow man in a time of trouble, Airbnb has been able to facilitate relief in more than twenty major global events since 2013. Of course, the best part of this is the lives that have been eased and even saved in times of trouble, but numerous industries should also pay attention to how Airbnb has benefitted from this exemplary outreach.

Here’s a quick sampling of the exceptionally favorable media coverage of the emergency response strategy:

That is a set of national and local references any business would envy. And the comments on articles like this one show just how well the public has received Airbnb’s efforts:

In utter marketing-ese, these consumers have not only been exposed or re-exposed to the Airbnb brand via the article, but have also just gained one new positive association with it. They are on the road to becoming potential brand advocates.

What I appreciate most about this scenario is that, in contrast to Brand A’s situation, this one features universal positivity in which all parties share in the goodwill, and that is literally priceless. And, by taking an organized approach to emergency preparedness and creating policy surrounding it, Airbnb can expect to receive ongoing appreciative notice for their efforts.

Room for hero brands, large and small

The EPA predicts a rise in extreme weather events in the United States due to climate change, including increases in the precipitation and wind of storms in some areas, and the spread of drought in others. Added to inevitable annual occurrences such as tornadoes, blizzards, and earthquakes, there are two questions every intelligent brand should be asking and answering internally right now: How can we help in the short term and how can we help in the long term?

Immediate relief

In the short term, your business can take a cue from Airbnb and discover available resources or develop new ones for providing help in a disaster. I noticed a Hurricane Matthew story in which a Papa John’s pizza deliverer helped a man in Nebraska get in touch with his grandmother in Florida whom he had been trying to reach for three anxious days. What if the pizza chain developed a new emergency preparedness policy from this human interest story, using their delivery fleet to reconnect loved ones… perhaps with a free pizza thrown into the bargain?

Or, there are restaurants with the ability to provide food or a percentage of profits to local food banks if they are lucky enough to still have electricity while their neighbors are less fortunate.

Maybe your company doesn’t have the resources of Everbridge, which has helped some 900+ counties and organizations communicate critical safety information in emergencies, but maybe your supermarket or the lobby of your legal practice can offer a free, warm, dry Wi-Fi hotspot to neighbors in an emergency.

In brief, if your business offers goods and services to your local community, create a plan for how, if you are fortunate enough to escape the worst effects of a disaster, you can share what you have with neighbors in need.

Long-term plans

According to Pew Research, 77% of Latin Americans, 60% of Europeans, 48% of the population of Asia and the Pacific, and 41% of the U.S. population are worried about the immediacy of the impacts of global warming. A global median of 51% indicates that climate change is affecting people right now.

From a business perspective, this means that the time for your brand to form and announce its plans for contributing to the climate solution is right now. Your efficient, green, and renewable energy practices, if made transparent, can do much to let the public know that not only will you be there for them in the short term in sudden emergencies, but that you are also doing your part to reduce future extreme weather events.

• Every time I walk into the local Kohl’s department store, the in-store messaging informs me that the building is powered, in part, by solar and wind energy.
• Green Swedish startup Wheely’s Cafe is the fastest-growing coffee company in Europe, vending organic beverages from bicycle-based carts.
• Here’s a furniture manufacturer in Connecticut that went solar, two companies that rent and recycle children’s toys, and Canada’s first all-electric taxi service.

Whether your business model is green-based or you incorporate green practices into your existing brand, sharing what you are doing to be a good neighbor in both the short and long term can earn the genuine goodwill of the local communities you wish to serve.

Do something great

I often imagine the future unlived when I see brands making awkward or self-damaging decisions. I rub my forehead and squint my eyes, envisioning what they might have done differently.

Imagine if Brand A had implemented generosity. Imagine if, instead of raising its prices during that dreadful emergency, Brand A had offered a deep discount on its rooms to be sure that even the least fortunate community members had a secure place to stay during the hurricane. Imagine if they had opened up their lounges and lobbies and invited in homeless veterans for the night, granting them safety in exchange for their service. Imagine if they had warmly reached out to families, letting them know that cherished pets would be welcome during the storm, too.

Imagine the gratitude of those who had been helped.

Imagine the social media response, the links, the new stories, unstructured citations, reviews…

Yes, it might have been unprofitable monetarily. It might have even been mayhem. But it would have been great.

To me, firemen have always exemplified a species of greatness. In moments of extreme danger, they forget themselves and act for the good of others. Imagine putting a fireman’s heart at the heart of your brand, to be brought out during times of emergency. Why not bring it up at the next all-staff meeting? Brainstorm existing resources, develop new ones, write out a plan, make it a policy… Stand tall on the local business scene, stand up, be great!

Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!

Continue reading →

Posted by petewailesIn my day-to-day role at Builtvisible, I build tools to break down marketing challenges and simplify tasks. One of the things we as marketers often need to do is pitch content concepts to sites. To make this easier, you want to pitc… Continue reading →

Posted by randfish

Have you ever considered gating your content to get leads? Whether you choose to have open-access content or gate it to gather information, there are benefits and drawbacks you should be aware of. In today’s Whiteboard Friday, Rand weighs the pros and cons of each approach and shares some tips for improving your process, regardless of whichever route you go.

Click on the whiteboard image above to open a high-resolution version in a new tab!

Video Transcription

Howdy, Moz fans, and welcome to another edition of Whiteboard Friday. This week we’re going to chat about content gating.

This is something that a lot of content marketers use, particularly those who are interested in generating leads, individuals that their salespeople or sales teams or outreach folks or business development folks can reach out to specifically to sell a product or start a conversation. Many content marketers and SEOs use this type of content as a lure to essentially attract someone, who then fills in form fields to give enough information so that the sales pipeline gets filled or the leads pipeline gets filled, and then the person gets the content.

As opposed to the classic model that we’re used to in a more open content marketing and open SEO world of, “Let me give you something and then hopefully get something in return,” it’s, “You give me something and I will give you this thing in return.” This is a very, very popular tactic. You might be familiar with Moz and know that my general bias and Moz’s general bias is against content gating. We sort of have a philosophical bias against it, with the exception of, on the Moz Local side, some enterprise stuff, that that marketing team may be doing, may in the future include some gating. But generally, at Moz, we’re sort of against it.

However, I don’t want to be too biased. I recognize that it does have benefits, and I want to explain some of those benefits and drawbacks so that you can make your own choices of how to do it. Then we’re going to rock through some recommendations, some tactical tips that I’ve got for you around how you can improve how you do it, no matter whether you are doing open content or full content gating.

Benefits of gating content

The two. This is the gated idea. So you get this free report on the state of artificial intelligence in 2016. But first, before you get that report, you fill in all these fields: name, email, role, company website, Twitter, LinkedIn, what is your budget for AI in 2017 and you fill in a number. I’m not kidding here. Many of these reports require these and many other fields to be filled in. I have filled in personally several that are intense in order to get a report back. So it’s even worked on me at times.

The opposite of that, of course, would be the report is completely available. You get to the webpage, and it’s just here’s the state of AI, the different sections, and you get your graphs and your charts, and all your data is right in there. Fantastic, completely free access. You’ve had to give nothing, just visit the website.

The benefits of gating are you actually get:

• More information about who specifically accessed the report. Granted, some of this information could be faked. There are people who work around that by verifying and validating at least the email address or those kinds of things.
• Those who expend the energy to invest in the report may view the data or the report itself as more valuable, more useful, more trustworthy, to carry generally greater value. This is sort of an element of human psychology, where we value things that we’ve had to work harder to get.
• Sales outreach to the folks who did access it may be much easier and much more effective because you obviously have a lot of information about those people, versus if you collected only an email or no information at all, in which case would be close to impossible.

Drawbacks of gating content

Let’s walk through the drawbacks of gating, some things that you can’t do:

• Smaller audience potential. It is much harder to get this in front of tons of people. Maybe not this page specifically, but certainly it’s hard to get amplification of this, and it’s very hard to get an audience, get many, many people to fill out all those form fields.
• Harder to earn links and amplification. People generally do not link to content like this. By the way, the people who do link to and socially amplify stuff like this usually do it with the actual file. So what they’ll do is they’ll look for State of AI 2016, filetype:pdf, site:yourdomain.com, and then they’ll find the file behind whatever you’ve got. I know there are some ways to gate that even such that no one can access it, but it’s a real pain.
• It also is true that some folks this leaves a very bad taste in their mouth. They have a negative brand perception around it. Now negative brand perception could be around having to fill this out. It could be around whether the content was worth it after they filled this out. It could be about the outreach that happens to them after they filled this out and their interest in getting this data was not to start a sales conversation. You also lose a bunch of your SEO benefits, because you don’t get the links, you don’t get the engagement. If you do rank for this, it tends to be the case that your bounce rate is very high, much higher than other people who might rank for things like the state of AI 2016. So you just struggle.

Benefits of open access

What are the benefits and drawbacks of open access? Well, benefits, pretty obvious:

• Greater ability to drive traffic from all channels, of course — social, search, word of mouth, email, whatever it is. You can drive a lot more people here.
• There’s a larger future audience for retargeting and remarketing. So the people who do reach the report itself in here, you certainly have an opportunity. You could retarget and remarket to them. You could also reach out to them directly. Maybe you could retarget and remarket to people who’ve reached this page but didn’t fill in any information. But these folks here are a much greater audience potential for those retargeting and remarketing efforts. Larry Kim from WordStream has shown some awesome examples. Marty Weintraub from Aimclear also has shown some awesome examples of how you can do that retargeting and remarketing to folks who’ve reached content.
• SEO benefits via links that point to these pages, via engagement metrics, via their ranking ability, etc. etc. You’re going to do much better with this. We do much better with the Beginner’s Guide to SEO on Moz than we would if it were gated and you had to give us your information first, of course.

Overall, if what you are trying to achieve is, rather than leads, simply to get your message to the greatest number of people, this is a far, far better effort. This is likely to reach a much bigger audience, and that message will therefore reach that much larger audience.

Drawbacks of open access

There are some drawbacks for this open access model. It’s not without them.

• It might be hard or even totally impossible to convert many or most of the visits that come to open access content into leads or potential leads. It’s just the case that those people are going to consume that content, but they may never give you information that will allow you to follow up or reach out to them.
• Information about the most valuable and important visitors, the ones who would have filled this thing out and would have been great leads is lost forever when you open up the content. You just can’t capture those folks. You’re not going to get their information.

So these two are what drive many folks up to this model and certainly the benefits of the gated content model as well.

Recommendations

So, my recommendations. It’s a fairly simple equation. I urge you to think about this equation from as broad a strategic perspective and then a tactical accomplishment perspective as you possibly can.

1. If audience size, reach, and future marketing benefits are greater than detailed leads as a metric or as a value, then you should go open access. If the reverse is true, if detailed leads are more valuable to you than the audience size, the potential reach, the amplification and link benefits, and all the future marketing benefits that come from those things, the ranking benefits and SEO benefits, if that’s the case, then you should go with a gated model. You get lots of people at an open access model. You get one person, but you know all their information in a gated content model.

2. It is not the case that this has to be completely either/or. There are modified ways to do both of these tactics in combination and concert. In fact, that can be potentially quite advantageous.

So a semi-gated model is something we’ve seen a few content marketers and companies start to do, where they have a part of the report or some of the most interesting aspects of the report or several of the graphics or an embedded SlideShare or whatever it is, and then you can get more of the report by filling in more items. So they’re sharing some stuff, which can potentially attract engagement and links and more amplification, and use in all sorts of places and press, and blog posts and all that kind of stuff. But then they also get the benefit of some people filling out whatever form information is critical in order to get more of that data if they’re very interested. I like this tease model a lot. I think that can work really, really well, especially if you are giving enough to prove your value and worth, and to earn those engagement and links, before you ask for a lot more.

You can go the other way and go a completely open model but with add-ons. So, for example, in this, here’s the full report on AI. If you would like more information, we conducted a survey with AI practitioners or companies utilizing AI. If you’d like the results of that survey, you can get that, and that’s in the sidebar or as a little notification in the report, a call to action. So that’s full report, but if you want this other thing that maybe is useful to some of the folks who best fit the interested in this data and also potentially interested in our product or service, or whatever we’re trying to get leads for, then you can optionally put your information in.

I like both of these. They sort of straddle that line.

3. No matter which one or which modified version you do, you should try and optimize the outcomes. That means in an open content model:

• Don’t ignore the fact that you can still do retargeting to all the people who visited this open content and get them back to your website, on to potentially a very relevant offer that has a high conversion rate and where you can do CRO testing and those kinds of things. That is completely reasonable and something that many, many folks do, Moz included. We do a lot of remarketing around the web.
• You can drive low-cost, paid traffic to the content that gets the most shares in order to bump it up and earn more amplification, earn more traffic to it, which then gives you a broader audience to retarget to or a broader audience to put your CTA in front of.
• If you are going to go completely gated, a lot of these form fields, you can infer or use software to get and therefore get a higher conversion rate. So for example, I’m asking for name, email, role, company, website, Twitter, and LinkedIn. In fact, I could ask exclusively for LinkedIn and email and get every single one of those from just those two fields. I could even kill email and ask them to sign in with LinkedIn and then request the email permission after or as part of that request. So there are options here. You can also ask for name and email, and then use a software service like FullContact’s API and get all of the data around the company, website, role and title, LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, etc., etc. that are associated with that name or in that email address. So then you don’t have to ask for so much information.
• You can try putting your teaser content in multiple channels and platforms to maximize its exposure so that you drive more people to this get more. If you’re worried that hey this teaser won’t reach enough people to be able to get more of those folks here, you can amplify that through putting it on SlideShare or republishing on places like Medium or submitting the content in guest contributions to other websites in legit ways that have overlapped audiences and share your information that you know is going to resonate and will make them want more. Now you get more traffic back to these pages, and now I can convert more of those folks to the get more system.

So content gating, not the end of the world, not the worst thing in the world. I personally dislike a lot of things about it, but it does have its uses. I think if you’re smart, if you play around with some of these tactical tips, you can get some great value from it.

I look forward to your ideas, suggestions, and experiences with content gating, and we’ll see you next week for another edition of Whiteboard Friday. Take care.

Video transcription by Speechpad.com

Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!

Continue reading →