Archives for 

seo

Getting Authorship to Work: A Moz.com Case Study

Posted by RuthBurr

Having author markup working on your site is important—especially if, like Moz, you’re producing new blog content daily. Not only does having an author picture snippet in the SERPs help increase clickthrough, it also builds trust with users when they see an author they already know and respect has written a piece of content. Author markup may also help sites get other special results such as the in-depth article result. All in all, Google seems to be doing a lot to encourage blog owners and writers alike to implement authorship markup on their sites.

So why is it so $@%#! hard to get working properly?

Behold the epic saga of trying to get authorship working on Moz.com. It’s been almost two years, and we’ve finally gotten it working (mostly) correctly. I wanted to share our journey with you in the hopes that it will take you less time to figure out what’s going on with your own site.

Part I: In which we have a brief hiccup followed by success

When I started at Moz back in 2012 (in the before times; the long long ago; the SEOmoz), authorship wasn’t working properly on Moz.com because… well… it hadn’t been implemented properly. In the “Join the Moz Community” buttons you see to the right of each blog post, the link to our Google+ page was overriding author markup on individual posts. This meant that Google thought that the Moz page was the author of each posts. We were getting a nice little author snippet with Roger’s picture, but individual authors were out of luck.

A friendly Moz community member pointed this out right after I started, and we were able to get it fixed up pretty quickly. The result: SUCCESS!


We started seeing correct authorship snippets almost right away. And I was all like:

But then, something changed.

Part II: In which everything is terrible

After several months of authorship appearing for content on Moz.com with no problems, our authorship snippets disappeared. Poof! Suddenly we couldn’t find a single example of the snippet appearing for Moz content.

The worst part was that Google’s Structured Data Validator tool claimed that our author markup was working just fine:


What often happens in situations like this is that Google changes the criteria for a snippet to appear, but doesn’t update the validator tool until much later. In this case, what I suspect happened is that Google got stricter about how markup could be implemented and still work, probably due to too many false positives. Our markup wasn’t perfect, but it was close enough for Google to connect the dots—until they decided not to anymore.

Unfortunately, this also meant we couldn’t rely on the validator tool to tell us whether or not we’d fixed the problem. With no more information than “it stopped working for some reason,” I set out to troubleshoot everything I could think of.

Part III: In which things are tried

We were using the 2-link method for authorship markup, in which we link from the author’s byline to his or her Moz profile with “rel=author” and then from the author’s profile page to their Google+ page with “rel=me.” Like I said, this was working fine until it wasn’t anymore.

Here are the things we tested to try to get authorship working again:

Nofollow links from social sharing buttons to Google+. Remembering our earlier fiasco, we tried nofollowing links to Google+ from our social sharing buttons. I remember thinking “if this is the problem, that’s really stupid” but it wasn’t.
Result: No change.

Linking directly from author byline to Google+ profile. Historically on the Moz blog, the post author’s byline links to his or her profile page in our community section. Concerned that this made for too many links for Google to parse, we tested linking directly to authors’ Google+ profiles from their bylines.
Result: No change. Also, you guys HATED it. Turns out that the ability to click through from an author’s byline to read more posts by that author is a feature our readers love.

Adding nicknames in Google+. Many of our authors don’t blog under their real names. For example, Dr. Pete’s first name isn’t really Doctor. To see if the nickname thing was throwing Google off, we got a few of our authors to add their nicknames in Google+.
Result: No change.

Start using authors’ real names. In your Moz community profile settings, you have the option to tell us whether or not you’re comfortable with us displaying your real first and last name, as opposed to your username. Because not everyone chose this option, our default was to show everyone’s usernames. Since Google+ is such a stickler for people using their real names and faces, we updated our settings so that users’ first and last names were their author bylines instead of their usernames.
Result: No change, but…

Link to Google+ with real names. Feeling sure we were onto something with the whole “real names” thing, we tried switching the anchor text on profile page links to Google+ profiles. Now, instead of saying e.g. “randfish on Google+,” links to Google+ from Moz profile pages would say “Rand Fishkin on Google+.”
Result: Success…?

Our “use real names” initiative got authorship snippets appearing in the SERPs again: hooray! However, in many cases they were the WRONG results:

This is a post by Rand.

This is a picture of Erica.

Part IV: In which all (OK, most) is revealed

It turns out that Google is currently very sensitive to byline information. Any instance of the word “by” followed by someone’s name – especially if that person also has authorship set up on the site as well. On the Moz blog, any comment that had been edited after posting had a notice that said “Edited by (user) on (date).” That extra instance of “by” followed by a name was messing Google UP. We changed the wording on edited comments, and authorship was fixed! Mostly!

We are actually still seeing this problem crop up from time to time in posts where we say “by (person’s name)” in the body of the blog post, and then that person comments on the post. It’s not a super common occurrence, but it does happen, especially since people tend to comment on posts in which they’re mentioned. Beyond removing the instance of “by” and changing the post wording, I haven’t figured out a systemic fix for that yet. Further bulletins as events unfold!

TL;DR

In order to get authorship working, here are some things to keep in mind:

  • You can’t always trust the validator tool. Check your SERPs (in an incognito window or with personalization turned off) to be sure.
  • Google takes any instance of “by (person’s name)” seriously, so if you’re getting the wrong author snippet, check for that first.
  • Adding nicknames in Google+ is much less effective than using your real name. Wherever possible, use real first and last names to get author snippets.
  • For more on troubleshooting authorship, read Mark Traphagen’s post from last year (notice I didn’t say “this post by…” well, you get the idea).

Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!

Continue reading →

Why Guest Posting and Blogging is a Slippery Slope – Whiteboard Friday

Posted by randfish

While guest posting can be a wonderful way to build your authority and earn links, it takes a huge amount of effort, and it’s easy for marketers to start slipping down the “Guest Posting Slope of Madness.” One of Rand’s predictions for marketing in 2014 is that Google will begin to crack down on low-quality guest posts, and in today’s Whiteboard Friday, he clears up some of the misconceptions that can lead to a downhill slide.

Whiteboard Friday – Why Guest Posting and Blogging is a Slippery Slope

For reference, here’s a still of this week’s whiteboard!

Video Transcription

Sarah: Howdy Moz fans. This is Sarah Bird, and I am the new CEO and that’s why I am doing Whiteboard Friday. Today, we’re going to talk about guest blog posting because that’s SEO. Okay, so the first thing you have to do is think of something [Rand guides Sarah aside] …

Sarah to Rand: But I’m the new CEO, and that means I do the …

Rand: Howdy Moz fans, and welcome to another edition of Whiteboard Friday, which I will still be doing for, well for a very, very, very long time to come I hope. Today I wanted to tackle a tricky topic. I know it’s going to be a controversial one because a lot of folks in the SEO space do a lot of guest posting and guest blogging, but there’s a challenge here. So I made some predictions last week, a couple weeks ago now, in the new year about what 2014 will bring.

One of those is that I predicted that Google will be taking some webspam action, essentially the Webspam Team will be building an algorithm to target guest posters, people who do a lot of guest posting and a lot of guest blogging at scale to get links back to their site in order to rank. This is a very common strategy that many, many folks use, and here’s why it’s a slippery slope.

So oftentimes we start up, up here. You’re sort of super white hat, and “Oh, yeah you know I’ve got some great stuff to share, but my site doesn’t get all that much traffic so maybe I should go and see if Huffington Post or Mashable or maybe the Moz Blog or any of these sources will take it because I have a great post.”

Hey, what do you know? A lot of the time if you have something relevant and useful and great to say and you have some great ideas to share, some great visuals, some data, fantastic. You can get those guest posts on those big sites. Then you start to slide down the slope a little. You think, “Oh, yeah, that Huff Post piece went really well, and hey, I got a link. I got a live link out of it. Maybe that link will help me rank a little better, boost my authority, and I don’t know, that’s kind of nice. I should do some more guest posts and get more links. Maybe I’ll find some sites that can send me some traffic and boost my profile and authority out in the sphere and get a few more links.”

This is still totally, pretty much fine, pretty much okay. But then you slide down this little slope. There’s this devious little part right here, between the I’m doing this for kind of authority boosting and traffic sending reasons and I’m just doing this for the link.

So you slide down the slope, and then you get, “Oh, man, finding decent sites that will take my guests posts is really hard, and I keep having to write really good stuff and come up with new ideas because they all want unique content. You know what? Maybe I’ll just start going to any places that I can go where I’ll get a link. Then eventually you slide down into this sort of total black hat territory where you are, “You know, I bet I could scale this and even automate it. I’m going to use a team of outsourced writers, and I’m going to use a team of outsourced placement specialists. I’m going to write some little thing to scrape through the links I download from OSC from my competitors and scrape through the Google results and find any place that’ll take a guest post, who’ve taken five or more with spammy anchor text before, because that’s what I want.”

Oh, brother. That’s why I call this the guest posting slope of madness. Madness! It is madness, because think about what happens here. Essentially you’re going down this slope, and maybe you’re seeing results, more and more results, but you don’t know whether these links and these links that you’ve slid down into are actually really helping you or whether the authority and the profile that you’ve built from these good ones and all the other good marketing activities and the things your product is doing and your brand is doing are helping you, and you might think these are. So you keep doing them and then bam! You get smacked by a Penguin or the guest posting algo or whatever it is that comes next, and you have to go and try and get these folks to remove all these links, you have to disavow them, you’ve got to send your reconsideration requests, you’re out of the search results for weeks or months at a time, usually months, sometimes years.

What have you done to your site? What have you done to your SEO? What if you had taken all this effort and energy and put it into just doing this stuff and then once you built up this authority doing most of the posting on your own site where people would be linking to you?

One of the frustrating things about guest posting that people forget all the time is that when you are putting content somewhere else, especially if that’s good content, especially if it’s stuff that’s really earning traffic and visibility, that means all the links are going to somebody else’s site. Somebody else is earning most of the attention awareness, and granted some of that is transferring on to you and that’s why we do guest posting. But you have to be aware of that, and that leads me into some flawed assumptions.

Flawed assumption number one: More links are always better. This is not the case. This is not the case. I have seen many, many sites with just a few, a handful, a few dozen to a few hundred great links far outranking their brethren with thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of links. All links are not created equal.

Less editorial restriction is better. When you’re guest posting you’re like, “Oh, they’re so picky, these editors. Man, they want me to jump through all these hoops. Let me find some place that’ll just take whatever I’ll throw them.” Guess what? If they take whatever you’re throwing them, they’re taking whatever the rest of the Internet is throwing them, and we all know what the rest of the Internet looks like.

Number three: The link matters more than other factors, other factors like traffic and influence and credibility. Also not the case. I’ll be totally honest. I will take a great guest post that refuses to link to me or that only no follow links to me if I know that 5,000 or 10,000 people are going to read that piece and a few hundred people are going to re-tweet it and a few hundred people are going to like it on Facebook, because that is boosting my influence and my authority, and that is creating all kinds of things that will have second order effects that impact my SEO and my broad web marketing far better than just a link.

When should you guest post and blog? Well, like I said, if you’re trying to reach that new audience, that new audience that another site or page or blog has captured, great. Guest posting is a wonderful choice. For example, let’s say here at Moz we’re trying to reach into the design community. We might go to some wonderful web design sites, Smashing Magazine, for example, and say, “Hey. Would you guys want maybe a good resource on SEO for designers?” They might say, “Yeah, great we’d love you.” Perfect. That’s a perfect marriage there.

In addition to creating a relationship with another organization through content, I also love this. This is a great way to build some early stages of relationship with another company before you do a formal partnership, and it helps to see whether there’s kind of an overlap between your two organizations’ audiences, such that you might want to do a deeper kind of relationship, maybe a sponsorship or an investment together, project or product together.

Quick note here. For your marquee content, your best stuff, I strongly — see how I’ve underlined strongly — strongly suggest using your own site. Reason being, if you’re going to put wonderful stuff out there, even if you think it could do better on somebody else’s site, in the long term you want that to live on your own site.

The last note I’ll make is that Google’s Webspam Team has been telegraphing for nearly a year that they are coming after sites that are using guest posting tactics at scale. You’ve heard comments from Google’s Head of Webspam, that’s Matt Cutts. You’ve seen comments on the Google Webmaster blog. You’ve heard them talk about it at conferences. If you’re not getting the message, they are sending it directly to all of the folks in the SEO world that guest posting and guest blogging are targets for webspam in the future.

So just be very, very careful please and stay up and don’t fall down this slippery slope. All right everyone, thanks so much. Take care.

Video transcription by Speechpad.com


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!

Continue reading →

My Final Post as CEO: Sarah Bird Has the Conn

Posted by randfish

In case you missed the post on my blog last month, we have some big news to share: I’m officially handing over the reins as CEO, and am thrilled to welcome our President and COO Sarah Bird into the role. I sat down with Sarah for a conversation about our memories from working together these past seven years and our plans for the future at Moz.

Rand and Sarah Discuss Their Role Changes

Video Transcription

Rand: Howdy, Moz fans. I’m Rand Fishkin, the CEO her at Moz, and I’m joined by my longtime partner in the business, Sarah Bird, who has been our Chief Operations Officer up until today, and in fact I’m going to be handing off my CEO role to Sarah.

Sarah: Wait, what’s happening?

Rand: You don’t remember this?

Sarah: No.

Rand: I sent a memo.

Sarah: Yeah.

Rand: And as part of that we wanted to discuss a little bit about why the CEO transition is happening, the new role that I’ll be taking, how things might change, and what will stay the same under Sarah’s tenure. I hope you enjoy it.
Gosh, I think we first met at Kim’s house. Right?

Sarah: Kim’s house.

Rand: Or at her apartment.

Sarah: Mm-hmm.

Rand: Was that 2002, ’03?

Sarah: I was thinking about this. It was probably three. It was probably the beginning of her second year.

Rand: And you were in law school.

Sarah: We were in law school together, and our friend Kim is a natural connector. She never forgets a face. She is the kindest person on the planet. She makes great food, and she was throwing one of her epic parties of bringing great people together.

Rand: She became a lawyer.

Sarah: She became a lawyer.

Rand: And then she left the law, and now she’s a chef.

Sarah: Now she’s a chef doing what she loves.

Rand: Yeah. There were probably seven or eight people at that dinner. My memory is, the first time you met me you called BS on me and thought I was full of it.

Sarah: Yeah.

Rand: And I really liked you.

Sarah: Yeah. It’s funny, because I thought that you were naive because you believed something you read on the Internet. And I was, like, “Oh, dear.”

Rand: To be fair, the Internet is full of junk, right?

Sarah: Yeah. But I wasn’t sure you knew that at the time. “No, I read this story about a guy who doesn’t have to eat. I read it on the Internet.” And I was, like, “No, people have to eat.” Just because it’s on the Internet doesn’t mean it’s true. So I was lecturing you about the Internet.

Rand: I remember Geraldine, my wife, was there.

Sarah: Yeah. Although you were not married yet. You were dating.

Rand: No. We had just started dating maybe a couple of years before.

Sarah: And she and I really bonded, because we had both read this both that we read way too early in our young lives. We read them when we were ten. It was a Judy Bloom book. Right?

Rand: Oh God. I remember those.

Sarah: I was like, “Oh my God. I was scarred by that book as a child.” I was scarred too.

Rand: Well, they have you read it really early. Then fast forward probably, what, four or five years later. It’s 2000 . . .

Sarah: 2007.

Rand: . . .’07, and you had been working in a . . .

Sarah: A law firm.

Rand: Like a family practice kind of thing?

Sarah: General practice.

Rand: General practice.

Sarah: The bread and butter of a lot of general practice is family law, so I did a lot of family law. But I did a lot of other things too.

Rand: Yeah. And then my memory is that you just sort of emailed me randomly, because we had been hanging out as friends for years, and said, “Hey, I’m thinking about making a change.”

Sarah: My memory is we had already had a schedule. We were all scheduled to go out to dinner, you, me and Geraldine anyway.

Rand: Okay.

Sarah And I had just given my notice.

Rand: Oh.

Sarah: That’s my memory of it. I remember telling you guys at dinner, like, “Okay, I did it. I made the decision. I don’t know what I’m going to do next.”

Rand: Hmm. Did I talk you into it then?

Sarah: That’s my memory. It was that you said, “Well, you know I have this round of funding. You should totally come and help out.”

Rand: Oh, yeah. This is the same time that Michelle Goldberg and Ignition Partners were putting their first million dollars into Moz.

Sarah: And you were talking to me. It was like, “Are these good deal terms or what?”

Rand: Oh, yeah.

Sarah: While I was still at the practice.

Rand: That’s right.

Sarah: Right.

Rand: Thanks for not charging me.

Sarah: Yeah. You’re welcome. And your mom, actually, Gillian was a great supporter, very kind. So she interviewed me and was like, “Yeah, you should come onboard.” Which is crazy.

Rand: And I remember that we had like an early board meeting. I think one of our first official board meetings.

Sarah: In January.

Rand: You came to it, and that was January ’08, which you attended sort in like . . .

Sarah: General counsel.

Rand: . . . yeah, a counsel role. After the meeting, I remember you thought Michelle from Ignition didn’t like you at all.

Sarah: At all.

Rand: And Michelle talked to me and was like, “Sarah Bird is incredible. We should think about promoting her. Maybe we should give her a different role at the company, upgrade her responsibilities.”

Sarah: Yeah, which is hilarious, because I thought she was the Ice Queen. I was like, “I’m going to kill her with kindness over time. I’m going to be so nice to her she’ll come around.” And she did.

Rand: She liked you though.

Sarah: She did.

Rand: She loves us both.

Sarah: Yeah. We’re great friends.

Rand: How long was it before we made you COO?

Sarah: That was June. So about six months.

Rand: Oh, my gosh.

Sarah: Well, I was one of the oldest people in the company, and I came to the board meetings with a binder that had color coded tabs, and so clearly I was like the most qualified to be in operations. I’m saying that because I think an important part of the story, for entrepreneurs listening, is that it’s not necessarily the best idea to make hiring an attorney like your number eight person. I was number the number eight person, and it didn’t make a lot of sense. But I think that both you and I didn’t know a lot about the startup and the life cycle and how to make software, right?
We were starting out. We were really naive. We knew we liked each other. We knew there was mutual respect on intellect. So between intellect and wanting to do something great and similar values, we were kind of like, “Oh yeah, we should totally work together.”

Rand: I think one of the best parts that I’ve always found in our relationship, and I know we’ve had months and years where things were tough between us, right?

Sarah: Tough. Yeah, you wanted to fire me, and I wanted to quit at one point. It’s true.

Rand: I’m so sorry.

Sarah: No, it’s true. Both sides, right? But that’s part of the journey that’s been so great.

Rand: I’m really glad you stuck it out.

Sarah: I’m glad you stuck it out with me, right? I mean, here we are. It’s crazy.

Rand: I never wanted to fire you. I just wanted to change how we interacted. I wanted to agree more.

Sarah: Yeah.

Rand: Sometimes we disagree really passionately, and I think it’s always pushed me, I think, eventually to get better, to get smarter, and to refine the data behind my decisions and advance the breadth of what I’m considering in any kind of decision making format. So I really appreciate that.

Sarah: We got through the hard parts, right? Challenged each other. The xciting to me is that . . .

Rand: It’s pretty hard right now too.

Sarah: See, I think it’s harder for you than it is for me right now, right?

Rand: Yeah, that’s fair.

Sarah: Right. I think that going through that challenging period together in the business, where we both had to grow so much and learn so much and make really hard decisions for people we care about, I think we got to the other side of that, which builds a lot of trust. I don’t know about you, but I think no matter how much I’m disagreeing with Rand right now and I would go a totally different way, I never doubt your intent. I trust you so completely. I know you’re doing your best. You’re thinking the best you can about a long-term problem and wanting to act in accordance with your integrity.
So it’s great that we have a relationship where you take all of that other stuff off the table. There’s no room for suspicion or doubt.

Rand: Yeah. As I’ve been talking to entrepreneurs about this journey and about stepping down from the CEO role, one of the messages that I consistently hear from a lot of folks is, “I don’t have someone like Sarah in my life, in my professional life.” That’s something that I just strongly recommend. I think this process is so hard to go through alone, and if you don’t have that partnership, it makes it harder and harder.

Sarah: Yeah. Then, for me, I wasn’t someone who came in at Moz like, “Okay, well I’m going to start as general counsel, and then someday I’m going to be the CEO of that place.” You don’t start that way.

Rand: That’s so true.

Sarah: It wouldn’t have occurred to me. “Someday I’m going to be . . . that’s my game plan. I’m going to start climbing that ladder.” So the fact that we have this partnership and that we’ve been working so closely over time has been great, because at different times in the business I think you and I both served different roles of the leadership, what the company needs at that moment, and that trust has grown over time. Now it’s the same thing. It is just shifting, right?

Rand: I see that time and time again. There’s an inverse correlation between desire for power and influence and ability to effectively hold power and influence.

Sarah: Yeah. Totally.

Rand: It seems like the people who are reluctantly accepting of the fact that, “I guess I am good at this, and I think I can take these things on,” are far better than, “I want to control everything.”

Sarah: Yeah. That’s so true. It’s also one thing that I struggle with in this transition. A lot of people ask, “Oh, how are you feeling? How are you doing? Are you nervous? Are you scared?” I’m actually not scared, and I’m not even anxious. I am uncomfortable with formal titles and formal perceptions of power. It’s just something that has never been valuable to me. There’s a lot of weird like cultural mythologies and baggage around CEOs and leadership. So it’s been interesting for me to be, “Okay, now I’m the CEO of a tech company, $30 million tech company.”
That’s awesome. I’m so happy about that. In the day-to-day, I don’t think twice about it. I don’t have any anxiety. But in sort of the bigger picture I’m like, “Wow, how did I become the boss man?” You know?

Rand: You’re still not the boss man.

Sarah: Yeah, it’s true. So something for me in terms of talking about the transition and even sort of my desire to celebrate it, how I talk about it with my family, I feel a little bit of awkwardness just around like, “Yeah, I’m the boss now.” It’s weird, right?

Rand: I know exactly how you feel. There’s this like . . . I don’t know what it is. Something after work tomorrow, like a little celebration . . .

Sarah: Yeah, a little celebration.

Rand: . . . that you guys are doing for the tenure that I’ve had as CEO here, and that’s very kind and flattering, but I also felt incredibly uncomfortable.

Sarah: of course.

Rand: I almost sent the email that was like, “Please don’t do this. I don’t feel like I deserve it.”

Sarah: Yeah, I know.

Rand: It’s a tough thing to accept.

Sarah: It’s weird.

Rand: I think we’re on the same page.

Sarah: Yeah, we’re similar in that way. We’re kind of hippies at heart in some weird social justice way. Right?

Rand: That is true.

Sarah: What you said earlier too about how lucky we are to have this partnership and how unique it is, I do think it’s because a lot of entrepreneurs, when they get to that hard point, those crisis points that we’ve gotten to at various times in the relationship, they give up then because I think they have less at stake, where you and I had such a friendship ahead of time that we had a lot of motivation around it to say, “You know what? I’m going to go back to the table. I’m going to listen.” Or, “Actually, I can compromise on this one.” I think that having that extra value around you and I needing to be together for the long term . . .

Rand: The sum cost of friendship.

Sarah: Right. The sum cost. This is someone that it’s more than a business relationship, even a very important business relationship that forces you to go back to the table and work through whatever issue you’re having, that then creates this very resilient partnership we have now. Right?

Rand: Yeah. I totally agree with that.

Sarah: It’s special.

Rand: What I think is insane about that is that, the flip side, what you hear all the time from folks in the business and entrepreneurial community is, “Be very careful about working with your friends and your family and those kinds of things.”

Sarah: Right.

Rand: But we’ve seen the good and the bad sides of that.

Sarah: Yeah. I wouldn’t recommend it. I’m not off telling my friends like, “Find your best friend and start a business with them.” I’m not recommending it.

Rand: I’m really glad it worked.

Sarah: Yeah. Things are going to be different. I don’t think that they will be drastically different. I think that if there was something really wrong with the company, you, the board would have said, “We need a big change. We need a very different person to come in.” You’d bring in an outside person who is going to drive a lot of change.
Things are not going badly, and you and I have been great partners together in so much. I think you and I both said we agree 90% of the time, and the 10% of the time we disagree, it’s usually, thank God, about something that one or the other of us is kind of like, “I don’t have a lot passion about that. So here’s my opinion, but go for it.”
The amount of times where we disagree, it’s something where we’re both, like, “I am like an eight or a nine on this. I’m really, really uncomfortable.” I can count them on like one hand in the last many years, right?

Rand: They have been few and far between.

Sarah: Few and far between.

Rand: And I think that we’ve done a good job one compromising on them. Also, one of my favorite things about our interactions is that we don’t keep score.

Sarah: No. Well, we both have really bad memories.

Rand: Wait, what?

Sarah: That’s great, because we can’t keep score. We can’t keep score because we can’t remember who said what.

Rand: Yeah.

Sarah: It’s great.

Rand: That is a good combination. One of the things that I hope, as we make this CEO change, is that you can apply some of the strengths that you’ve got, particularly around process and organizational scale, people development, that are things where I’ve sort of been very hands off and almost just let them coast a little bit. You can tighten those up and make them a part of our company and culture as we go forward. But I don’t know how much of that is going to be felt externally.

Sarah: Yeah. I agree.

Rand: My hope is that what happens is as you tightens those things, it simply feels very fluid, like, “Gosh, Moz is producing better and better quality software and content and things that help marketers at a more and more rapid pace, and I feel like I can rely on them more and more. But I don’t necessarily feel this massive change.”

Sarah: They’re not going to wake up next week and have it be like, “Whoa, what happened to Moz?”

Rand: Yeah, exactly.

Sarah: What I hope will happen is that Moz will get a little bit better every week, both internally, with how efficient we are and how in line we are with our TAGFEE values, but also the value we’re delivering to the customer. So it won’t be a moment of like, “Whoa, Moz changed.” But maybe nine months from now customers will be like, “You know, Moz has been putting out a lot of really good stuff lately.” That’s what I would like to see happen.

Rand: Yeah, agreed. So my new role is I feel like a little less defined than yours, but in some ways I’m excited about that. Things that I know that I’m going to keep doing, I’m obviously going to keep working on a lot of evangelism and marketing stuff, so continuing to blog, hopefully even more frequently than I had been last year, continuing to speak at a lot of conferences and events, obviously doing a lot of video, Whiteboard Friday, all that kind of stuff. But then I also have this new product architect role where I’m going to be working on particularly the research tools, so Open Site Explorer and Fresh Web Explorer, keyword difficulty, the Moz bar a little bit with the big data team around some of our new initiatives there.
I’m excited about that. I mean those are areas where I have historically contributed, but as CEO I didn’t get to really focus on them. They’re almost like ancillary portions of my job that just happen to overlap, and we thought for a long time, “Well, we should have product managers take those over.”
So I’m kind of excited about getting to do those things. I have to write a book this year.

Sarah: Yeah.

Rand: That’s on my list. My title is going to be Individual Contributor or Wizard of Moz externally, but nothing formal. Who am I reporting to?

Sarah: You’re reporting to me.

Rand: I’m reporting to you, okay.

Sarah: We will have conversations about expectations for sure.

Rand: I hope to not need improvement really as often as I have the last five years. That’s my goal performance wise.

Sarah: Yeah, definitely. I’m excited for you to be able to be free on some of the things that are your real superpowers. You have an incredible gift of understanding.

Rand: Growing a beard.

Sarah: Growing a beard, which I will never compete on.

Rand: Yes.

Sarah: I think you have an incredible gift to grasp complex projects and complex algorithms and organizational dynamics that has made you a really effective marketer and leader. It’s going to be great for you to take that knowledge and focus on communicating it and creating content around it more consistently than you have been able to as CEO.

Rand: Yeah.

Sarah: I think it’s going to drive a lot of value for the community and really play on your superpowers.

Rand: Yeah. I’m really excited to offload some things. I mean, I love our executive team, but I don’t think that I’ve done a very good job having them report to me and being a coach and mentor for those folks.
I was talking to someone over coffee today about the role that I play. This person was very surprised. He said to me, “Gosh, I feel like I know you pretty well, and I’m surprised to hear that you don’t think of yourself as a good coach and mentor for the team.”
What I told him was, “I think I’m really good at communicating externally.” The way that I coach and communicate is through the blog, through social media sharing, through video. I’m not great at sitting down one on one and being like, “Well, Sarah, I need you to work on these things. I think this is where you can improve your career growth.” I can’t even remember a time when we’ve done a one on one like that.

Sarah: It’s not our thing.

Rand: Well, it’s not my thing. I’m hoping that you’re going to do a great job, that you can sit down with people like Anthony and Annette and Adam. Is everybody named A?

Sarah: That was the case, but then we have M, JB and Glenn now.

Rand: Oh yeah. Right.

Sarah: So it was like the triple As.

Rand: Matt Brown. Right, so that you can help upgrade all of those folks.

Sarah: Yeah. One of the things I’m really passionate about, that I think is a little bit different than what you brought to the org is having some more clarity around when decisions get made, who makes those decisions, accountability for them, real team building within each different governing body within the organization, and making sure we’re all independent enough to move quickly, but also operating in alignment, I think, is very critical.
I think you’re totally right. You’ve done a great job of leading, about marketing and TAGFEE externally and internally. I’d like to see you continue to do that and actually bring some of your marketing knowledge back into Moz. A really interesting exercise for you, if every presentation you gave externally, you gave that same presentation internally as a lunch and learn.

Rand: Hmm.

Sarah: Would that raise the whole level of awareness about marketing and what marketers are thinking about the team.

Rand: Yeah. That’s an interesting idea.

Sarah: We have a lot of one on ones to go. Different planning.

Rand: That sounds good. And in terms of the obligations and roles that you’ll be taking on as CEO . . .

Sarah: Yeah. You’ve got to set the vision for the company. You’ve got to hold the team accountable. You’re ultimately responsible for execution and for really driving the vision, obviously with the board. We’ve got a wonderful board of great, supportive people. A lot of stakeholders there, but it is the CEO’s vision to communicate that, to drive it home, drive it to consensus, and then get the team on line to execute on it.

Rand: Sarah, what do you think is going to be the toughest part? What do you think is going to be the hardest part of being CEO?

Sarah: Gosh, actually I’m not sure yet. I’m in an unusual position, because this is a company I know so well, and I have worked so closely with you for so long that a lot of the role is already very familiar to me. So my challenges, I think, are actually going to be much more about just my own perception and making sure to think of myself as, “I am that person.” I need to make sure I am communicating clearly and setting that vision across the organization, whereas right now, being a second in command, it’s pretty awesome. I have so much influence and none of the public accountability or even the internal accountability really, because you haven’t been a hard driving manager.
So I kind of had the best of both worlds, and now I’m taking on the public accountability, the internal accountability, and that’s something I know that I’m going to need to be comfortable with and get comfortable with over time.

And then of course you always worry about people. It’s a tremendous responsibility, both to our customers, to the community, to the folks on the team to really deliver true value to them in all the different ways that each of those groups and constituents need value. So I take that very serious.

Rand: I think one of the things that was a little odd for me, Geraldine described it the other night to some of our friends. She was saying that, “I think Rand was a little bit sad that people weren’t more upset that he was leaving the role.”

Sarah: Right. Right?

Rand: Right.

Sarah: You kind of want people to belike, “Don’t go!”

Rand: Yeah. But instead they were like, “Oh, this is a great decision. Yeah, you should totally do it!” “Get him out of here.”

Sarah: That’s not . . .

Rand: I know that’s not how people perceived it, but there was definitely like that . . . the amount of support, like the amount of positivity around the decision made me go, “Maybe I should have been doing something else before now.”

Sarah: The Internet has been so nice, right?

Rand: They have. They have been wonderful.

Sarah: Yeah. It’s been great.

Rand: Which is a rare thing for the Internet.

Sarah: Thank you.

Rand: Yeah. Keep it up.

Sarah: Yeah. I can see that. I think part of that is one of your strengths as a leader, that’s really pushed me and helped me grow, is that transparency and authenticity. So you have been very clear and honest both internally and externally. When there are parts of your role that you’re not loving, people know about it.

Rand: Sure.

Sarah: It’s not a secret. Everyone cares so much about you personally that when they know how unhappy you are, they want you to be happy, and so when you discover a path to happiness, of course people are going to be like, “Well, yeah, you should do that.” I hope we all can make those kinds of decisions, have the self- awareness to recognize when you’re not being fulfilled.
I think what you’re doing is so unique, because for most people the mythology and the draw of that CEO title, you want to go to your class reunion and be the CEO of a great company. There’s all this public perception that you have achieved something, you’ve made it. That is success. And most people, I think, don’t have the self-awareness to reflect back and say, “Well, it doesn’t really matter that that’s the cultural understanding of success. What’s my personal understanding of success?”

Rand: That’s very flattering. Thank you. It’s very nice.

Sarah: Yeah. I think it’s great. We can all learn from that.

Rand: I’m most excited about being able to say yes to some things and no to others and feeling less guilt. That is sitting high on my list of items, just not feeling guilty for passing off an investor contact, or something to do with press, or something external, and just passing that over to you, or forwarding something on and not making a call about it, the decision.
I think I’m also excited about being able to dig in on things where I really want to. I want to spend a bunch more time figuring out how we can improve the spam algorithm that Dr. Peters and the data science team have come up with. Going and having an hour to dig around the web and look at a bunch of web spam papers and not feel guilty about, “Gosh, I’m really spending . . .”

Sarah: That’s not CEO work.

Rand: Yeah, that’s not CEO work. The product manager should be doing that or the product architect. “Oh wait, I’m the product architect! I get to do this.” That’s awesome for me. I’m excited about that.

Sarah: Yeah, you’re going to be great. I’m excited on your behalf for that, and it’s going to add a lot of value to the community and to the company to have you doing that as part of your job.

Rand: I hope so.

Sarah: It will. What am I excited about? I’m excited about a lot of things. I’m excited that this is a huge opportunity for growth for me. There are new challenges in this role, things that you do as second nature that you don’t even have to think about, like for example this video. You’re on video all the time. You’re very public. You are always doing these press things, whatever that is, and that will be new for me. Even just managing the time for it. I’m not that concerned that I’ll pick up the skill. I think I’m competent enough to eventually, someday, I hope, be comfortable on video and other public formats.

Rand: You seem plenty comfortable to me. You did a great job at MozCon. You do well on video. I don’t think you have . . .

Sarah: But I’m not a Rand Fishkin. That’s okay. I will never be exactly like Rand Fishkin.

Rand: I can tell you, it’s weird being in here.

Sarah: So I’m looking forward to taking on some of those challenges. That’s going to be managing my schedule, managing my priorities. I’m really looking forward to . . . I feel lucky. Honestly, I feel like I get the opportunity to sort of shepherd Moz in what’s going to be a wonderful phase. I think that you have this feeling like, “Oh, 2013 was such a challenging year.”

Rand: It was really hard.

Sarah: You feel like, “I’m not giving the company to her in the best state.” I feel like, “Wow, Rand did most of the shit work, and I get to come in after that’s done and be like, ‘Well, all right. So let’s just tune that, and we’ll tune that one and just tweak this thing here. All right. Done.” I hope I’m right.

Rand: I hope you’re right too. I do feel like the challenges of scale are so . . . and maybe this is just a different skill set kind of thing. But I feel like they are so less suited to the things that I love to do and the things that I’m good at, and the intersection of those two things at the early stages was fairly strong. The intersection today at this size is drifting away.

Sarah: Yeah. It’s getting more into the stuff that I just love, right?

Rand: I feel really lucky to have you here.

Sarah: Me too. I feel lucky to be here. Opportunity of a lifetime. It’s crazy. It’s like, “Hey mom, I’m a CEO!”

Rand: Yeah. Whew.
I see the future of web marketing going in a lot of different directions and some big overarching trends. Some of those are I think that Google has been moving away from being a utility to becoming a business, and Google’s business is focused on Google’s interests. Businesses can still get a remarkable amount of value through earning traffic from Google, but you have to conform to the way that their business interests dictate, and that’s very different from the historical Google is building a highway through the Internet for traffic.
I also see a lot of trends around more people moving into things like content marketing, social media marketing, and SEO, and I think that means it’s harder and harder for businesses and creators and creatives to stand out from the crowd.

Sarah: And you have to manage workflow. It’s a very fragmented market in terms of where you need to spend energy and time and how you can reach customers. I think that’s making a marketer’s job more complex. Then you add in things like keyword not provided, and there’s a real transparency problem and just a time management problem.

Rand: I feel like that’s our obligation, right?

Sarah: Yeah, from the beginning.

Rand: You and I and Moz, and the 128 rest of us, all of us, our job is to bring back data that these other networks have taken away or that scale of networks have removed. Something like a Twitter, they’re not trying to obfuscate data like Google is, but the scale of social media has made finding the needle in the haystack impossible. That’s what we have to do as a company is show here’s the value. Here’s how you can take action on that. those kinds of things.

Sarah: Surfacing the insight across all the different properties where you have to have your eye on, I have a lot of empathy for the average marketer out there who is just, “How do you manage your day?”

Rand: Yeah.

Sarah: We need to help them do that.

Rand: Especially those small to medium businesses. They are overwhelmed by the obligations that they have in order to both earn traffic for themselves or their customers, if they’re consultants, and the disparity between the information that’s offered by the networks and what they actually need to be able to report and improve.

Sarah: And then if you have the time to get access to some of that data, the time and the resources, then the Excel spreadsheets, you need to put it all together. You could spend your whole day just trying to analyze the data after you’ve gotten a hold of it from random sources, and then at what point are you actually doing your work? When are you moving the ball forward, because you’re so busy looking at shifting spreadsheets, right?
So I have a lot of empathy for that. I think that the good news is it’s a problem that computers can solve, that math can solve. It’s not an unsolvable problem.

Rand: And a great UI/UX.

Sarah: Great UI/UX is going to be absolutely critical to that so that we’re saving people time and really driving them towards the right insights at the right moment.

Video transcription by Speechpad.com


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!

Continue reading →